Actual scientific study provides evidence that warming may not be as severe as initially predicted.
""Bayesian estimation of climate sensitivity based on a simple climate model fitted to observations of hemispheric temperatures and global ocean heat content""
The analysis uses the short period of time where warming has appeared to level off as brought up by hawcreek.
However this work is done by actual scientists.
I bet a dollar creek cannot define Bayesian without copy and pasting from wiki..
Still this is one hopeful paper among the mass of less optimistic papers. Gee if all scientists are for hire as the mmgw deniers suggest i wonder who paid for this study??