How can you be for the 2nd amendment and not the 5th? Seems at least those who shout about their right to carry guns should also shout about the right to keep their mouth shut if they feel it will incriminate them. If the White House knew about the IRS vendetta against the Tea Party, then proceedings should start to impeach the President. My guess is they did not, since the prior head of IRS was a G Bush appointment who knew about this wrong doing and if he could get Obama he would.
YOU MUST SURELY MEAN MARK SANFORD AND LARRY CRAIG unless they have special dispensation to do the things Anthony Weiner did. Probably like out on the interstate where everybody has to abide by the speed limit except the vehicles with Texas license plates who somehow are allowed to run 85-90 when the rest of us have to drive 70-75 mph--am I right?
The right wing extreme is for what they think, they distort both the second and fifth to fit. That's why it is ilogical, it's all false thinking with one purpose in mind. No outrage, no impeachment of Bush, when the NAACP was targeted by the IRS, Congressman wrote letters to the IRS saying they should revoke the tax exempt status, no outrage then. Obama is the one who is being targeted with lies about him, and it's wrong.
Everyone here I have noticed is for both, what some like myself are not for is a misinterpretation of what it means. One cannot take the stand, proclaim their innocence then refuse cross examination. If one receives immunity which I would suggest for her, she must testify.
People have a right to invoke the fifth, and normal, thinking people have a right to draw conclusions as to why.
Thinking true Americans want to know who directed Rice to lie about Benghazi. Thinking patriotic Americans want to know why conservative groups were targeted while similar Obama groups got the fast track to approval. If you leftists accept these apparently Nixonian tactics they will later be used against you.
That statement is so foolish,
She could answer some questions if she so chooses, but also refuse to answer others...at any time.......i'm sorry the 5th amendment offense some of you Constitutional Republicans..but its in there
She isn't testifying, which she has the right not to, and is innocent until proven guilty, no conclusions, because it is a circus like in the days of McCarthy. A witch hunt, guilty before proven innocent, guilt by mob conclusion. If you want to learn more and go to law school, then do that. As long as you disappear for awhile. At least go read wiki on it.