According to July 5, 1989, article in the Miami Herald, the then-director of the New York office of the United Nations Environment Program (UNEP), Noel Brown, warned of a “10-year window of opportunity to solve” global warming. According to the 1989 article, “A senior U.N. environmental official says entire nations could be wiped off the face of the Earth by rising sea levels if the global warming trend is not reversed by the year 2000. Coastal flooding and crop failures would create an exodus of ‘eco-refugees,’ threatening political chaos.”
In 1989 we were told we would burn if we do not stop emitting carbon.
We increased carbon emissions a minimum of 33% and guess what........
They lied to you. the oceans did not rise and the earth started cooling.
but guess what else...............
obama still trying to pass radical laws taxing us for having energy.
And the carbon emissions continue to rise and the earth continues to cool.
Increased regulations on emissions and requisite fines have resulted in movement of operations requireing fossil fuel gernerators to areas of the planet (China, India) wher no regulation exists. An unintended consequnce of government regulations has been a net increase in emissions WW since these other countries have no such regulations and their generators suck. Time to reset and rethink the whole process.
In the 1950's they were teaching that we were going back into the ICE AGES?? It is AL Gore and the likes getting rich off the poor. Running up groceries, gas, utility bills, but they are for the poor (themselves).
The important thing controlling a mob of warmist zeolots or any religious mob is to periodicially tell them what they WANT to hear in a CONVINCING fashion, whether it is TRUE or not is irrelevant. The warmists nutjobs are already captured into the warmist religion and don't need the truth..
"the warmists nutjobs are already captured into the warmist religion and don't need the truth.."
So now the truth is defined as "anything that the anti-warming people can find that pokes even the smallest hole in data collected and verified by tens of thousands of scientists, totally and completely makes their findings false, and reverses their findings. This is even true if we only find 2-3 holes in 48 pedabytes of data, and the holes were found by people not qualified to make these assertions in the first place. See "conspiracy". "
They don't need the truth? You could just easily have said that the anti-warming movement feels the same way. I mean really, how hard is it to take gobs of data that you don't like, insert some new stuff, cherry-pick through the rest, and produce what you want to see?
Gee, that kind of sounds like unskewed polls. Boy, that really worked out.