What says you, Soiled One? LVLT is UP 39.2% YTD while T is barely above breaking even. Adding in the juicy 4.5% dividend you are getting from T, T is STILL trailing LVLT, not to mention all of the indices...
Let me help you answer that, Mr. Wright, since you don't know your history. LVLT was part of a very successful construction firm called Kiewits which is responsible for laying down 50% of our national railway and nearly all of our highways. It was a spin-off from Kiewits.
As for your comments about T being around 100 years, Kiewits have been around just as long. T is having $40bln in operating cash flow. If it wasn't for Apple and Cingular's customers, T would have been BANKRUPT in 2006. Oh, instead of looking at $40bln in operating cash flow, have you looked at T's LONG-TERM DEBT lately? How is that LTE network coming along for T, Mr.Wright... LOL!!!
Soiled One, let me remind everyone here that you were also the one who was yelling out "Short" LVLT when it was at $23. So, take your BS and shove it right down your throat. Stop yacking like you had been long LVLT from the get-go. Spare me the Bull-Sheet!
No T a GOOD thing ? If I hadn't started buying T back in 1964, I would have been working for the previous 15 years of my life. The perspective of 50 yrs of time is a great teacher. But lets just see what LVLT can do in 2014.
Really? Could have fooled me with your "good thing I own a bunch of LVLT". Sure you don't act and sound like a LVLT owner. You act more like LVLT disgruntled loser, but we already know that you, don't we? Weren't you the one who was trying to school me about LVLT's loss of Cingular contract here? Instead of schooling me, you got the biggest financial education of your life.
So now you are gloating? What a freaking hypocrite! You sound like gwocMOFO. You don't know if you are catching or receiving from gwocMOFO....