RCMP Market Enforcement Team gives Barrick a pass;
RCMP ... Integrated Market Enforcement Team ... File # 2004-IMET-001 ... Jan 24, 2006
Dear Mr. Lopehandia ...
........ "After conducting a comprehensive investigation into your complaint it was determined that based on the circumstances of the case there is insufficient evidence to proceed with criminal charges against Barrick Gold Corporation, or any of it's officers, directors, or employees"
Of course Jorge has a different interpretation than that of the RCMP Integrated Market Enforcement Team - but then again, MWR gave Jorge $928,000 over the last year (with no signed agreement of any kind); a pretty nice gig you got going there Jorge.... hey, when I get my Back-of-the-Napkin claim, I'm going to try hitting MWR up for $1.5 Mil. per year.
it is amazing the ability of some to twist reality.
Re RCMP-IMET Letter Jan 2006.
RCMP did not properly investigate, to date Mina Pascua's theft by ABX, on record.
Like Canada's Court, RCMP "relied in Barrick's credibility & reputation to be telling the truth".
Unfortunately for the Banks, TSE-TSX, NYSE, IRS, RCMP/IMET, the gang of Barrick's insiders lied like MADOFF - ENRON / BRE-X
RCMP-IMET 2011, will have a very different point of view, given all developments of record that made the force look like very incompetent abbetters, rether than the true investigators "RCMP always gets its man".
They went from pseudo investigators of Barrick's crimes, to simply re-printing Barrick's Annual report's malarchy and promotional lies.
That is 100% the record re RCMP-IMET 2006/2011, with all due respect to good elements of the force.
The RCMP 2006 letter you quote, was quashed by the June 19th, 2006 Judgment, adverse to barrick proving RCMP 100% wrong.
Quashed by November 2008 SUPREME COURT decision, proving RCMP 2006 letter 100% wrong.
Quashed by MWR's public release, proving RCMP 2006 letter 100% wrong.
further quashed by Barrick not owning legally MINERA NEVADA'S - PASCUA LAMA PROTOCOL properties as listed in the DIARIO OFICIAL DE CHILE, December 11, 2004.
Proving RCMP 2006's letter 100% wrong.
In essence, you have a "selective reading - very selective memory syndrome".
You have indeed over looked at the facts of record provided at the minapascuachile . com website
I have often wondered how Enron, Madoff, Bre-x and the like got away with their fraud and theft for so many years. My_name_.. you are a good example of how they managed to keep the lies going for so long. People like you, on mass, refuse to critically examine irrefutable evidence. The worst part is that your denial is predicated on derogatory comments void of rational thought and evidence. Keep on going... it's fun to watch :)
Check to date of that RCMP letter, Jan 2006. Anyone with half a brain knows JL put that letter on his website to show ABX lied to the RCMP.
Fast forward to 2011, a lot has happened in between.
Glad to see your interest in the matter.
You are the king of the bleeding obvious.
No one would publish compromising evidence to itself, ask Barrick about Pascua files would you?.
The 2006 RCMP letter check the date, January, 2006, was written before Judgment casme down June 19th 2006, making the RCMP letter null & void at law/
Barrick sued the Judge and has lied about her and her Supreme Court of Chile validation.
Barrick is in deep trouble with RCMP - IMET the very people that you quote, will be the witnesses of Mina Pascua owner you fool.
They will become Crown witnesses or hostile witnesses, but wit they will. All of them.