% | $
Quotes you view appear here for quick access.

Barrick Gold Corporation Message Board

  • pascuaforensics pascuaforensics Apr 29, 2011 12:30 PM Flag

    Regarding legal Chile files

    On record, Barrick has engaged to defend a USD$20 equivalent MINA PASCUA area claims contract (8600 hectares containing most of Mina Pascua Chile at 1996 owned by Jorge Lopehandia) spending USD Millions to date.

    The same has been done by the counterparts defending Mina Pascua rights, at 2011 in multiple legal actions against Barrick:

    Legal Civil C-1912-2001 injunction over the ore body, valid 2001 to date. (Prior to barrick illegal lawsuit of Mina Pascua owner in Canada)
    All proceedings are contrary to Barrick's public stance at 2011 via STOCKWATCH.

    *** ABX neglected to file it as material facts.

    Criminal proceedings since Feb. 2002 affecting Peter Munk, Patrick garver, Vincent Borg, Randall Oliphant, since 2002, only Randall was sent after slottered from ABX's CEOship.

    *** ABX neglected to file it as material facts.

    Constitutional challenge to PASCUA LAMA PROTOCOL validity.

    This protocol that allows barrick a right to transit and surface, is flawed as barrick Gold Corporation has filed stolen and improper claims as backing up their exploitation of Gold, Copper & Silver.

    PASCUA LAMA PROTOCOL is so flawed, that Barrick owes to the system the entire MINA PASCUA cache of minerals today!

    Barrick included exploration of salts claims (LAC 1994 claims) and TESOROS claims (under Jorge Lopehandia's legal tenure 2001 to date) to back up its flawed december 11, 2004 PASCUA LAMA PROTOCOL and its bogus PASCUA LAMA PROJECT

    Barrick is in debt with RCMP - IMET 2004/2011

7.61+0.45(+6.28%)Oct 9 4:00 PMEDT