do you know anything about chile?..I have family there and here in the USofA...chile is one of the most business friendly court systems in the world..remember Univ of Chicago experiments??...just forget about your rants..fak=lling on deaf ears
What the other poster meant is that if JL has clear legal title to the mining claims then there would be no need be involved in a legal dispute with Barrick.
If the mining claims are owned by JL, then they could not have been "stolen". You seem to confirm that Barrick has possession of the claims by asserting that they were "stolen" and JL no longer has a clear title.
Which is it?
You've been following this as closely as the rest of us so you know full well that Jorge has produced documentation to substantiate his claims. They formed a major part of the 10 page news release of Mar. 2, 2011. They are independently verified by third party individuals.
I love how certain individuals come on this board and try to discredit the facts with generalized statements. I don't know what will come of this whole thing, no-one does, but you can't keep discrediting real information by ignoring it and saying it doesn't exist. However, what doesn't exist is a positive response by Barrick. hmmm!
Did it ever dawn on you that Jorge might be the Madoff in this case? - has Jorge EVER ONCE produced even just a copy of the claim title he's repeatedly stated he once owned?.
your advise sounds like an "easy way out"...
It is like ... remember the masacres by the Romans or Caligula? then... ignore Hitler.
Your proposition is herein summarily rejected as ... "give the crooks a brake"...
it is futile, ABX has to face the music and own up to their fraud buy exiting world markets like ENRON did
I do not want to meddle in your private motives for having a double standard, however, I take npotice that you call yourself a male, yet show a girl picture...
no comments needed...