1. The reasons and prestenses (simulation of contract and negotiations to attain surface rights) of Barrick to say that it enjoys surface rights in Chile, is a criminal act.
As such, it shall be enforced upon them.
Surface rights belong to he/she who mines.
Surface rights allow Barrick to sell hotdogs to real miners owners of MINA PASCUA CHILE.
PASCUA LAMA PROTOCOL is flawed Barrick abused two large claims in the same spot, one no metallic, the other under injunctioned privilege, to make a mess and cesspool of crime its flawed PASCUA LAMA PROTOCOL you cite.
Welcome to Earth son.
Barrick is the largest collection of mining fraud since Bre-X.
There is no way out, all pseudo explanations are futile.
Law is the law.
Barrick paid USD$20 equivalent for 30 million ounces of Gold and that is unconstitutional in Chile.