Sun, Dec 28, 2014, 1:32 PM EST - U.S. Markets closed

Recent

% | $
Quotes you view appear here for quick access.

Barrick Gold Corporation Message Board

  • pascuaforensics pascuaforensics Nov 28, 2011 10:09 AM Flag

    Warning ABX moved PASCUA MINE of LAC 1994

    Away to some burro pastures at the Chile - Argentine border.

    Far away from LAC 1994 holdings,

    in accordance to flawed maps delivered to SILVER WHEATON regarding the sale of Silver from Chile.

    This constitutes fraud - impersonation of asset + defacing of an SEC PROSPECTUS more than thrice.


    All activities at BARRICK GOLD CORPORATION 1996-2011 are involved in crime - money laundering & theft.

    + Deception and doctored SEC/OSC filings 1996 to date.

    Crime, "what a way to grow" eh? Peter Munk, ABX?

    SortNewest  |  Oldest  |  Most Replied Expand all replies
    • I guess they plan on mining where the gold is rather than where the access road and the dump site are.

      • 4 Replies to mtstack2000
      • Continued DD from above...

        3.-The PASCUA-LAMA Project was throughout its life initiated, housed, protected and located inside of the mining properties LOS AMARILLOS 1 through 3000, and these properties, as I described in a previous TECHNICAL REPORT, have been affected for more than 4 years by an overlap in the groups of surveys of the TESORO ONE through TESORO TWELVE mining properties, itemized above. 

        4.-I have before me the Official Gazette of the Republic of Chile for Saturday, December 11, 2004, where the Ministry of Foreign Affairs [.-] PROMULGATES AN ADDITIONAL SPECIFIC PROTOCOL CONCERNING INTEGRATION SPECIFIC TO THE TREATY ON MINING INTEGRATION AND COMPLEMENTATION WITH THE REPUBLIC OF ARGENTINA FOR THE “PASCUA-LAMA” MINING PROJECT. In Appendix 1, entitled DEVELOPMENT CONCESSIONS OF “COMPAÑÍA MINERA NEVADA LIMITADA”, NOVEMBER 2003, WITHIN THE ALREADY CONSTITUTED PROTOCOL-PROPERTY AREA. Amongst other mining properties, they mention the mining properties LOS AMARILLOS 1 through 3000, whose status has already been described. Also mentioned are the TWELVE groups of mining properties TESORO ONE through TESORO TWELVE, comprising a total surface area of [blank] hectares; their status has also already been described and they belong to Mr. HECTOR UNDA LLANOS according to a document granted by the Vallenar Registrar of Mines and bearing the date June 15, 2011, and on its margin appear the words property of Mr. Jorge Rodrigo Lopehandia Cortes.

        CONCLUSIONS REGARDING LEGAL TITLE AUTHORITY AS AT JUNE 15, 2011. To this date there are no valid marginal annotations on these title deeds in the name of Barrick Gold Corporation-ABX of Canada, Barrick Chile or Minera Nevada Limitada, according to an original copy of same which I have before me. The original 2011 copy DOES certify by means of a marginal annotation the litigious rights of Mr. Jorge R. Lopehandia Cortes as the first-claim legal right to title. 

        FINAL CONCLUSION. The properties LOS AMARILLOS 1 through 3000 and TESOROS should not have been included in the list of mining properties as being the property of BARRICK GOLD CORPORATION-ABX of Canada, due to the fact that these properties have not been nor are they now registered in the name of said firm at the Registrar of Mines of the City of Vallenar, in the Atacama Region, Republic of Chile, in conformity with Chilean law. Moreover, these title deeds could not have been transferred or sold or contracted in any manner whether in Chile or abroad due to the fact that a prohibition is in place, granted by a Chilean Court which prohibits the carrying out of actions or execution of contracts.

      • More Pascua Lama DD:

        1.-Nevada Mining Company

        1994 PASCUA-LAMA PROJECT THE AMARILLOS 1 THROUGH 3000.

        This mineral deposit (PASCUA-LAMA project) is located inside of the AMARILLOS 1 THROUGH 3000 mining properties and it is in turn located within the groups of mining properties TESORO FIVE and TESORO SEVEN, where they are located as shown in the report presented to COREMA and the pertinent entities and public opinion for the purpose of obtaining the corresponding sectoral permits for the development of the mineral deposit denominated PASCUA-LAMA, which is complemented with photographs from “GEOGLE” [presumably “GOOGLE”] showing the whole yellow mountain (alteration deposit) which is also mentioned in the official Survey Record, in the chapter entitled “Acceso al HM” [Access to HM]; the same is described in later surveys of the TESORO FIVE and TESORO SEVEN groups.

        2.-In a law suit at Santiago’s Fourteenth Civil Court, “rol No. C-1912”, corresponding to year 2001, entitled “VILLAR con COMPAÑÍA”, where a precautionary measure was granted covering mining properties AMARILLOS NORTE and AMARILLOS SUR; this precautionary measure also included the groups of mining properties TESORO ONE up through the groups of mining properties TESORO TWELVE, which also comprise the same land occupied by properties LOS AMARILLOS 1 – 3000 and similarly comprise land area within AMARILLOS SUR (1996 – 2011) which fully cover the original location of the PASCUA-LAMA Project whose registrations are up to date at the Vallenar Registrar of Mines, bearing the following marginal notes.- * Precautionary measure granted by Santiago’s 14th Civil Court, which includes a prohibition on carrying out acts and executing contracts affecting these properties ** On the margin of these registrations, which I have before me at this time, is a registration in the name of Mr. JORGE R. LOPEHANDIA, dated on JUNE 15, 2011. *** All these documents are up to date and were granted by the Vallenar Registrar of Mines and dated on JUNE 15, 2011. I have also had before me the Cadastre of the National [Chilean] Geological and Mining Service, which is the governing entity in matters of mining and it is charged with maintaining an up-to-date mining cadastre where one can clearly see that the groups of mining properties TESORO ONE through TESORO TWELVE (the whole listing, above) overlap mining properties LOS AMARILLOS 1 THROUGH 3000, these latter being the properties comprising the PASCUALAMA mining project. The National [Chilean] Geological and Mining Service, a state entity charged with maintaining the cadastre of mining properties in Chile, shows that the TESORO mining properties, itemized above, overlap the LOS AMARILLOS 1 through 3000 mining properties. The LOS AMARILLOS 1 THROUGH 3000 mining properties should have carried out the actions provided for in Article 95, No. 7, of the Mining Code against the groups of mining properties TESORO ONE through TESORO TWELVE which affected them. This action has a statutory limitation period of 4 years as set out in Article 96 of the same Code; said action was not carried out by the LOS AMARILLOS 1 through 3000 mining property. The same Article 96 of the Mining Code, paragraph three, indicates that once the limitation period runs out the concession is cleared of all encumbrances and it is moreover understood that the sentence [judgment] and its registration produce the effects indicated in Article 91 for each one. A sentence that in cases affected by numerals 6 and 7 of the foregoing article declaring the statutory limitation of the nullity action to which said numerals refer shall also DECLARE EXTINGUISHED the property affected by the overlap. The outcome is that all the groups of TESORO mining properties are cleared of all encumbrances and the mining properties LOS AMARILLOS 1 through 3000, affected by the overlap, are declared extinguished.

      • This from a expert Court accredited Chilean third party technical report regarding the Pascua Lama orebody:

        These mining properties were the origin and start of the PASCUA LAMA PROJECT according to background information included in the Environmental Impact Assessment study project presented to COREMA ATACAMA AT THE START OF THIS PROJECT; its CAMP as well as the PROJECT CENTRE was located in the Amarillos mountain which is located in WHAT IS TODAY the TESOROS 5 AND TESOROS 7 properties, and putting all the other properties comprised of TESOROS 1-30 THROUGH TESOROS TWELVE 1-5 respectively in as part of the PASCUA LAMA PROJECT. The mineral deposit subject of the environmental assessment lies within the boundaries of mining properties AMARILLOS 1 THROUGH 3000, once again being the origin of this project and nowadays said space is jointly occupied, according to the OVERLAP MAP [“Plano de superposición”] provided by SERNAGEOMIN, A CHILEAN STATE ENTERPRISE and the sole entity charged with administering mining properties in Chile, whose official document is in my possession and which I have before me and which indicates the said status of both mining properties. According to figure 3-2 of the Pascua-Lama Protocol area, the mineral deposit under consideration here lies between UTM coordinates North 6,755,000 metres to 6,757,000 metres and East 400,000 metres to 402,000 metres, approximately. However, if we look at the MAPS in question CURRENTLY reported by BARRICK GOLD CORPORATION, we find that in the detail corresponding to the AMARILLO 1 THROUGH 3000 mining properties they do not quite cover the area indicated as PROJECT in this sheet (image) and they now locate the new PROJECT, that is to say, this apparent OTHER, or NEW PASCUA LAMA mining project, already individually shown in the PROTOCOL AREA; this would be not the original project presented to COREMA ATACAMA located within the AMARILLOS 1 THROUGH 3000 mining properties as has been published, studied, traded and protocolized and under which BONDS AND FUTURE COMMODITIES SALES have been placed and other agreements signed, such as the PASCUA LAMA PROTOCOL between CHILE and ARGENTINA, in which both properties are included in the official documents issued by the OFFICIAL GAZETTE OF THE REPUBLIC OF CHILE, which is in my possession and which I have before me, DOMINION TITLES AND CURRENT OWNERSHIP CERTIFICATES, which not only have a PRECAUTIONARY INJUNCTION AGAINST CARRYING OUT ACTS AND EXECUTING CONTRACTS under an order of a COURT OF THE REPUBLIC OF CHILE, but also on said title deeds, the name of Mr. JORGE R. LOPEHANDIA is shown on the margins as the current dominion holder. WE ALSO ARE FACED WITH THE CLAIM BY BARRICK GOLD CORPORATION THAT IT IS THE OWNER OF THE PRECEDING TITLE DEEDS, WHICH DOES NOT CONFORM WITH THE EVIDENCE I HAVE IN MY POSSESSION AND HAVE HAD BEFORE ME ISSUED BY THE PERTINENT CHILEAN STATE ENTITIES, [AND THAT] IT IS THE OWNER OF THESE AREAS, AS THERE ARE NO REGISTRATIONS OF PROPERTY TITLE IN THE NAME OF BARRICK GOLD CORPORATION FOR THESE TITLE DEEDS AND AREAS.

        To read the whole report got to Sedar MWR Sept 21, 2011 release.

        http://www.sedar.com/DisplayCompanyDocuments.do?lang=EN&issuerNo=00009237

      • shish...

        you are persistent and willful...

        a) There is one mountain full of Gold that is called MINA PASCUA CHILE.

        There are burro pastures called PASCUA LAMA by Barrick Gold Corporation as per flawed & doctored maps of the SILVER WHEATON transaction.

        The gold does not move from Gold mountain to suit Barrick's pictorial renderings of PASCUA LAMA PONZI SCHEEME

        The Gold remains under control of property titles bearing the name Jorge Lopehandia, the party that BARRICK GOLD CORPORATION sued for libel in Canada.

        The question is why does this guy who gets accussed by Barrick of libel at Canadian Courts, have title to MINA PASCUA CHILE over atreas that Barrick filed 2011 as theirs?

        In other words, www.minapascuachile.com leaves no doubt that BARRICK GOLD CORPORATION is in overt deception to the public and not the other way around.

        It takes an elementary schiool level to understand the bleeding obvious.

        ABX lacks clean title at M9NA PASCUA CHILE, as per clear information of public domain.

 
ABX
10.58+0.27(+2.62%)Dec 26 4:00 PMEST

Trending Tickers

i
Trending Tickers features significant U.S. stocks showing the most dramatic increase in user interest in Yahoo Finance in the previous hour over historic norms. The list is limited to those equities which trade at least 100,000 shares on an average day and have a market cap of more than $300 million.