MINERA NEVADA LIMITADA is filed as owner of both above stated properties at PASCUA LAMA PROTOCOL 2004.
Barrick does not own either.
AMARILLOS 1-3000 slats & nitrates have a charge from third parties. Never ABX's.
TESOROS have a charge by injunction MPP C-1912-2001 from June 2001 to date in favor of Mr. Jorge Lopehandia.
So why Barrick goes saying all 2011 and 2012 v. MWR that "ABX is not affected by the litigation at its PASCUA LAMA PROJECT"?
Why a Judge in Chile calls MINERA NEVADA SpA (Barrick Gold Corporation TSX) to explain and take knowledge of the strike out of AMARILLOS 1-3000 the LAC 1994 (100% of PASCUA to ABX) investment?
How the mighty have fallen.
entangled in their lies, now exposed by a cease and desist order from Court, advice that acceptance of proceedings to strike out BARRICK'S MINA PASCUA in Chile, are in place for March 2012 notifications and appearances.
No wranglings allowed.
By the Chilean Mining Code dates of expiry and law, only.
Legal? no? strike out!
Happy Civil Rico daily trades at ABX + SILVER WHEATON fraud and PONZI SCHEEME of Chile Silver from MINA PASCUA
The asset that is not Barrick's at law in Chile.
Where Mina Pascua is.
ABX flamboyant owner by press of MINA PASCUA CHILE cited to Chile's Court to respond and justify such fraud.
Get ready for financial and precious metals prices and supply fireworks, as MWR + Lopehandia's OSC + SEC legal files, bring ABX down at PASCUA 2012.