Mon, Dec 22, 2014, 7:59 PM EST - U.S. Markets closed

Recent

% | $
Quotes you view appear here for quick access.

Barrick Gold Corporation Message Board

  • pascuaforensics pascuaforensics Mar 2, 2012 11:02 AM Flag

    ABX= no titles 2012 = Chile's authorities deny ABX title.

    Barrick is herein challenged to prove that Chile, will grant one, ONE, one misly title of TESOROS 2012 to Barrick, even 2001-2011 will do to "back up the SEC fraud & PONZI @ Pascua"

    Challenged to produce LAC'S MINERALS 1994 asset, Gold and Silver production permitted to Barrick 1994-2012.

    So to legitimize ABX or to prove 2012, CRIMINALLY STEALING of CASH FROM WORLDWIDE EXCHANGES 1994-2012

    Barrick has been left unable at law to have CERTIFIED DOMINION over PASCUA areas 2012.

    That means, Barrick does not enjoy the backing of Chile for its PASCUA PONZI SCHEEME.

    Not, unless Barrick proves that:

    MINERA NEVADA S.A. owns TESOROS for RCMP - IMET 2001 - 2006 when decision was made to "stop Pascua theft investigation".

    ABX conned IMET - RCMP 2006.

    or,

    MINERA NEVADA LIMITADA has TESOROS titles as per PASCUA LAMA PROTOCOL

    or

    MINERA NEVADA SpA owns TESOROS as per Barrick's SEC + OSC filings 2011.

    the truth?

    MWR has TESOROS 2012 IN THE NAME OF JORGE lOPEHANDIA 2001-2012.

    Barrick has another BNN v. SLW+ABX pASCUA PONZI lies.

    Why is Barrick so mum these days?

    When showing clean title could get MWR dumped at law from world exchanges and Lopehandia arrested for life?

 
ABX
10.32-0.510(-4.71%)Dec 22 4:01 PMEST

Trending Tickers

i
Trending Tickers features significant U.S. stocks showing the most dramatic increase in user interest in Yahoo Finance in the previous hour over historic norms. The list is limited to those equities which trade at least 100,000 shares on an average day and have a market cap of more than $300 million.