Setting the ABX libeled Lopehandia & MSX record straight, Dec 21, 2011 ABX publication
Barrick indicated that neither Jorge Lopehandia nor MSX had an interest in the TESOROS concessions.
Fact: Both Jorge Lopehandia as legal title holder of TESOROS 2001 to date and MSX holder of a valid Agrement with Jorge Lopehandia over the same areas in Chile, have indeed 100% MORE RELEVANT & LEGALLY VALID AUTHORITY over those areas than Barrick itself.
Barrrrick has to do with TESOROS for they were in fraud included at PROTOCOLO PASCUA LAMA page 8m December 11, 2004, yet they were under injunction C-1912-2001 listed as Barrick's MINERA NEVADA LIMITADA asset.
later MINERA NEVADA LIMITADA became MINERA NEVADA SpA listed by ABX at irs 6K March 2011 as TESOROS owner and PASCUA LAMA owner.
Whereas Barrick's lawyers indicated the TESOROS areas are indeed, the areas of greatest geological interest to PASCUA LAMA, MINERA NEVADA LIMITADA and MINERA NEVADA SpA recently in 2nd Civil Court proceedings at Vallenar, wir, they did not own titles, domain or Agreements with TESOROS titular.
That, leaves BARRICK naked short MINA PASCUA CHILE at SEC. Period.
The PROTOCOL can not be EXPANDED over my dead body and Chilean Constitution.
The procol may not be erased property as at Chilean law there are no retroactive valid legal actions. hence BARRICK lied now go to jail time it is. You think law is a game of hide & seek?
Barrrick's reserves are tied to AMARILLOS 1-3000 hence AMARILLOS UR (TESOROS) areas 2012
Do not fool yourselves or try to fool anyone Barrick
No title at PASCUA LAMA or better yet no title valid to exploit Gold at MINA PASCUA PROSPECTUS 1994 to date.
Hey Furball, why not listen for a change, MSX and JV entrepreneur Jorge Lopehandia will indeed kick barrick in the teeth soon at law, Right now in Chile, barrick is losing big time at law, soon the pascua saga will be over, you can also choose to ignore the news and put your head between your knees but believe me, barrick is in BIG TROUBLE my son