The article you post is completely inaccurate at this point.. Your author has taken back much of what he's said if you dig a little further.. He was recorded on Oct. 31 admitting to that he uses keywords and many other phrases that set off uneducated investors.. He's taken the claim back of the growth being "125%".. its actually only 2% with a dismal/declining revenue.. This company will very soon be investigated by the SEC.. Half of its audit committee has resigned, they don't want to go to jail. What reasonable person does?.. The board of directors are familiar with the antics and loopholes of wall street, not 3D printing or anything of the "businesses" relevance... Oh my.
He has not taken anything back and the SEC issue was self-reported and will most likely be non-event fine. This company is way undervalued and the leader in MIM. Closest comp is PRLB you are going to be covering in the 20's tomorrow