Wed, Oct 1, 2014, 7:07 PM EDT - U.S. Markets closed

Recent

% | $
Quotes you view appear here for quick access.

Vringo, Inc. Message Board

  • gregvrng gregvrng Nov 19, 2012 4:54 PM Flag

    GOOG wants more time to calculate Pre-Post judgement interest, etc. $GOOG has til 11/29 and $VRNG rebut 12/07

    r u kidding me - two weeks and still they are requesting more time. This is getting friggin crazy already. How about a response from the judge to show he is still alive and deny this. Come one it has been two weeks already!

    SortNewest  |  Oldest  |  Most Replied Expand all replies
    • From "The honourablejudgewapner" on SK board:

      Joint motions (delays) always smell like settlement. In this case, I'm guessing its a difficult and prolonged negotiation because Goog must indemnify the rest of their customers.

      Sentiment: Strong Buy

      • 1 Reply to ghart69
      • ghart69: Regarding Wapner's comments. That makes absolutely NO sence, they have an Indemnity Insurance Policy. For Google to have to worry about calculating for three customers is pathetic, unless their Insurer is denying their claims on the grounds of fraud or misrepresentation. If the judge were to grant two more weeks, it better be under the rules that JJ sets forth that Google can not appeal then, as it would make NO sence if it were inevitable that Google would appeal anyway.

        One could also conclude that this is in settlement stages, or has been settled, and that "obviousness" is no longer an issue.

        As far as Im concerned, if any of the above I just wrote is not true, all other excuses would be pure scandel!

        Sentiment: Hold

    • rocket docket my butt....this can take forever if two weeks are given to rev times interest amount = x . That is a friggin joke!

    • This is #$%$. There is no SEC filing, no real news articles saying this. Stop posting fake #$%$. If this is true then provide proof of this. I see nothing saying " wants more time to calculate Pre-Post judgement interest, etc. $GOOG has til 11/29 and $VRNG rebut 12/07" anywhere, buy on this message board which is mostly all #$%$.

      Sentiment: Hold

      • 2 Replies to edward.drossman
      • now edward say you are sorry and i will forgive you and keep posting truthful info as i always do..
        Pacer Update:

        UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE RESPONSES TO
        PLAINTIFF’S NOTICE OF CALCULATION OF PREJUDGMENT INTEREST AND
        MOTION FOR AN AWARD OF PREJUDGMENT INTEREST, POST-JUDGMENT
        INTEREST, AND SUPPLEMENTAL DAMAGES FOR DEFENDANTS’ POSTDISCOVERY/
        PRE-VERDICT INFRINGEMENT
        The Defendants AOL Inc. (“AOL”), IAC Search & Media, Inc. (“IAC Search & Media”),
        Gannett Co., Inc. (“Gannett”), Target Corporation (“Target”), and Google Inc. (“Google”)
        (collectively “Defendants”), by counsel, pursuant to Rule 7 of the Local Rules of Practice for the
        United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, move this Court for entry of an
        order granting the Defendants an extension of time through and including November 29, 2012, in
        which to file their Response to Plaintiff’s Notice of Calculation of Prejudgment Interest (Dkt.
        No. 791) (“Notice of Calculation”) and Plaintiff’s Motion for an Award of Prejudgment Interest,
        Post-Judgment Interest, and Supplemental Damages for Defendants’ Post-Discovery/Pre-Verdict
        Infringement (Dkt. No. 792) (“Motion for Award of Prejudgment Interest”), and in support
        thereof state as follows:
        2
        1. Plaintiff filed its Notice of Calculation on November 7, 2012. Under Local Rule
        7 and Fed. R. Civ. P. 6, Defendants’ response is due on November 21, 2012.
        2. Plaintiff filed its Motion for Award of Prejudgment Interest on November 9,
        2012. Under Local Rule 7 and Fed. R. Civ. P. 6, Defendants’ response is due on November 23,
        2012.
        3. The Defendants have requested, and the Plaintiff has agreed to, an extension
        through and including November 29, 2012, to file their response to the Plaintiff’s Motion for an
        Award of Prejudgment Interest, Post-Judgment Interest, and Supplemental Damages for
        Defendants’ Post-Discovery/Pre-Verdict Infringement.
        4. Defendants will not oppose an extension until December 7, 2012, for Plaintiff to
        file its replies in support of its Notice of Calculation and Motion for Award of Prejudgment
        Interest.
        5. Granting Defendants an extension through and including November 29, 2012, to
        file their responses to the Plaintiff’s Notice of Calculation and Motion for Award of Prejudgment
        Interest, and Plaintiff an extension through and including December 7, 2012 to file their replies
        in support of its Notice of Calculation and Motion for Award of Prejudgment Interest will not
        prejudice the parties.
        6. Attached as Exhibit 1 is a proposed agreed order granting the Defendants through
        and including November 29, 2012 to file their response to the Plaintiff’s Notice of Calculation
        and Motion for Award of Prejudgment Interest, and granting Plaintiff through and including
        December 7, 2012 to file its replies in support of its Notice of Calculation and Motion for Award
        of Prejudgment Interest. The parties are circulating a copy of this agreed order and will deliver it
        to the Court for entry once endorsed.
        3
        WHEREFORE, the Defendants, by counsel, request that this Court enter the proposed
        agreed order attached as Exhibit 1 granting the Defendants through and including November 29,
        2012 to file their response to Plaintiff’s Notice of Calculation and Motion for Award of
        Prejudgment Interest, and granting Plaintiff through and including December 7, 2012, to file its
        replies in support of its Notice of Calculation and Motion for Award of Prejudgment Interest.
        Dated: November 19, 2012

      • you are an idiot - watch for this news later and then i will accept your apology.

    • Wonder is this gambit is a pawn in a potential settlement game...

 
VRNG
0.9475+0.0023(+0.24%)Oct 1 4:00 PMEDT

Trending Tickers

i
Trending Tickers features significant U.S. stocks showing the most dramatic increase in user interest in Yahoo Finance in the previous hour over historic norms. The list is limited to those equities which trade at least 100,000 shares on an average day and have a market cap of more than $300 million.