Vringo, Inc. Message Board
-
Joint PACER Motion Suggest GOOG and VRNG Warming UP?!?
.....In addition, as directed by the Order, the parties are coordinating their efforts. Unfortunately, given the volume of unresolved motions and proposed sealed documents, the parties need additional time to complete their review. ....
Per PACER --- this is the first I have seen of sentiment that indicates "the parties are coordinating their efforts" Everything else has been an indication they've been at blows with one another IMHO.Sentiment: Strong Buy
-
so post the pacer
Sentiment: Sell
- 1 Reply to edward.drossman
-
Get your own account or go to VRNG dot free forums dot net and read it. YMB's restrictions that don't allow links make it difficult, don't you think? Go to Eastern District of VA's PACER section and search for the GOOGLE INC docket. You'll see them with I/P Engine as the plaintiff.
Sentiment: Strong Buy
-
Its amazing that anything substantive is followed by immediate BUMPS of basher comedy or drivel to get material information off the front page.........
Sentiment: Strong Buy
-
I hope they are not suggesting another extention............
Sentiment: Hold
- 1 Reply to tmoles5609
-
Actually, and extension would mean Goog is actually figuring out costs and payment schedules, not if they were going to pay, I think.... 3.5 % is great, 7% (per motions filed by VRNG briefes) is better if Goog balks, and continues to infringe-- willfully and in spite of the jury's verdict...
I am beginning to think Goog is just stalling to figure out how not to pay, yet they lost with the jury, the judge- unless he sets the jury all aside, not likely-- and they lost with the USPTO when they tried to nullify the pats, 3 out of 4, and VRNG kept the 3 that mattered money wise...
Goog is slowly painting itself into a corner, opening up Lach3es and an increased 3.5 to 7% royalty rate on retrial.. I guess they just can not deal with loosing yet....
-