914: DEFENDANTS’ NOTICE OF APPEAL
Defendants AOL Inc., Gannett Co., Inc. Google Inc., IAC Search & Media, Inc., and
Target Corporation (“Defendants”) hereby appeal to the United States Court of Appeals for the
Federal Circuit from the final judgment entered by the District Court in the above-captioned
action on November 20, 2012, any and all opinions, orders or rulings that gave rise to that
judgment, including but not limited to the Order entered as Dkt. No. 801, the Order entered on
June 15, 2012 as Dkt. No. 171, the Order entered on August 16, 2012 as Dkt. No. 212, the Order
entered on October 12, 2012 as Dkt. No. 705, the Order entered on November 20, 2012 as Dkt.
No. 799, the Order entered on April 3, 2013 as Dkt. No. 905, the Order entered on April 3, 2013
as Dkt. No. 906, and the Order entered on April 3, 2013 as Dkt. No. 907.
Case 2:11-cv-00512-RAJ-TEM Document 914 Filed 04/04/13 Page 1 of 4 PageID# 22824
Included is a payment of $5 filing fee required by 28 U.S.C. § 1917 and the $450
docketing fee required by Federal Circuit Rule 52(a)(3)(A), paid to this Court pursuant to
Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 3(e) and Federal Circuit Rule 52(a)(2).
Is this where they walk in with a letter invalidating Lang's patents as though they know the USPTO will find PATENTS TOO BROAD. I mean there going all the way back to the original filing dockets presented them in June 2012. They are appealing everything. Do they have a patented system in their pockets? They want all rulings from JJ and prior judges thrown out and heard by the appeals court. Can they get it? I really don't see why they wont with all the errors from this case. Will they shift strategies and come at Vringo with a different defense? Does JJ have to allow? All questions out of my pay scale.
good stuff ken. the keyboard lawyer ghost says google wont have to pay because he's a lawyer and the vrng lawyers wouldn't have anticipated an appeal and will just decide it's ok to wait until an appeal is decided before they get paid. ROFL