Here is the summary up top ---- The question presented is whether these claims are patenteligible under 35 U. S. C. §101, or are instead drawn to apatent-ineligible abstract idea. We hold that the claims at issue are drawn to the abstract idea of intermediated settlement, and that merely requiring generic computerimplementation fails to transform that abstract idea into apatent-eligible invention. We therefore affirm the judgment of the United States Court of Appeals for the FederalCircuit.
So it says ... if a abstract idea is transformed into a generic computer solution it is likely not patentable.
Our vrng patents are not for transforming existing abstract ideas ... and these vringo patents have been validated by the patent office several times. So Joe it is NO problem for vrng patents!