Is that an issue? I recall more than a few investors saying they were in this stock specifically because of the presence of Chad Mirkin. The continuing turnover two months after the mid-February purge is a little disconcerting. Have the Lurie folk alienated everyone important associated w/this company?
I agree that they were probably asked to leave. Both Bahk and Rosenberg had been with Nanosphere previously and had left. Maybe they left because they disagreed with the strategy and now Lurie has decided they were right all along. Also both had been working with Lurie and she probably decided that their work was good and they were needed to fix what is wrong with Nanosphere.
What is the hiring going on in production (at Nanosphere?) and how is this good for SPRD?
Lurie Investments has its team now fully entrenched and running the company. Is that a good thing? Is that what tends to happen before a company gets put on the block? In other words, have the technology guys set the table and w/their job completed, now the investment guys take the reins to wring the value out of the company? Basically they have moved from technology considerations to strategy (i.e.value realization) considerations.
sounds like you are concerned with more long timers leaving. Appears to me that people spnding the money to buy shares have been more than pleased with the chnges that started in mid Feb.The analyst that upgraded a few days ago had no problem either. Letsgive this new crew a chance to see what they can do.