% | $
Quotes you view appear here for quick access.

Linn Energy, LLC (LINE) Message Board

you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the posts
  • sandonthebeach47 sandonthebeach47 Nov 19, 2012 8:03 PM Flag

    "LINE added TWO great natural gas properties during that period BUT they are very profitable. "

    norris...look at the stories rlp is telling below....just more fantasy or more twisting what I actually did say again?

    He asked which Linn OIL properties in the last 2 years.....but asked that it not be a JV.....why because the Salt Creek was a 100% OIL acquisition. Then he says but he did not want JVs....oh 100% OIL but now JV's do not count.

    Oh, because he says so....LOL.
    Such male-cowmanure.

    I guess I should also run to check all of the acquisitions within the last two years because he said there were no oily ones, as if he really knew, yet,....that does not seem correct.

    Well, there were 54 Linn acquisitions....Maybe we can get a spread sheet of all of them for RLP from Clay and "prove" him wrong again....but should I waste the time again?

    Then he would probably just TWIST what I came up with like he TWISTED the question I posted above in this thread.

    And then he might post......see, I knew he couldn't do it...etc....Just more of the same RLP-shuffel.

    then, you may want to direct him to this:

    Cramer Talks Nat Gas
    Mon 19 Nov 12 | 06:45 PM ET
    Mad Money host Jim Cramer explains what it would take to see a move in nat gas stocks.

    Sentiment: Strong Buy

    SortNewest  |  Oldest  |  Most Replied Expand all replies
    • Hi Sand,

      You are correct. It is proven wrong on a daily basis but just drones on and on.

      It is about trying to stop domestic energy so base load 'alternative' energy does not seem to be the simple straightforward corruption it is.

      All day long from his Mom;s basement I an sure enough to bet on.

11.06-0.240(-2.12%)Mar 31 4:00 PMEDT