you are viewing a single comment's thread.
The Texas data does take all of that into consideration.....maybe you should go spend some time reading the Texas report.....posted by U Tex at Austin.
This is a good one:
"I refuse to even acknowledge such imbecility."
So much like your usual routine.
Oh, when you do calculate the USGS estimated quantities for ALL of the Marcellus and add ALL of the Utica.....
if you remain still unconvinced....then multiply by TEN and you will see just how far off that report you posted about may be off.
I do not think that you think that anyone will actually check these numbers.....pretty easy to check....still have that old calculator?
TEN TRILLION is that a one with 13 zeros after it?