Recent

% | $
Quotes you view appear here for quick access.

Linn Energy, LLC (LINE) Message Board

you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the posts
  • sandonthebeach47 sandonthebeach47 Jan 25, 2013 2:02 PM Flag

    No misinformation whatsoever

    Just so you are clear on how you changed your incorrect comment ONLY after seeing the state data.... and only insisting that you are correct, while you clearly just made it up.....

    First they were not going to be built since they were not economical.....wrong.

    Then not many were going to be built....wrong.....there are now Eight & one more ....maybe in 2016.
    Then this:
    There's no doubt that pipeline capacity will increase everywhere"

    So you went full circle.

    They do not build pipelines to every well and the data shows that Railroad capacity only goes to 880,000 barrels/day from this year 3013, out to 2016.

    And you also saw these numbers.....from the state of North Dakota....try to understand them...especially the RR #s from 2011 to 2012 & also in 2013, where it levles off.

    Pipeline takeaway for OIL in Bbls/day for The Williston Basin

    2008......272,000
    2009......286,000
    2010......337,500
    2011......413,000
    2012.....463,000
    2013.....658,000
    2014.....918,000
    2015.....1,018,000
    2016.....1,243,000

    Railroad takeaway for OIL in Bbls/day for The Williston Basin

    2008.....30,000
    2009.....95,000
    2010....115,000
    2011.....275,000
    2012.....730,000

    2013.....880,000
    2014.....880,000
    2015.....880,000
    2016.....880,000

    SortNewest  |  Oldest  |  Most Replied Expand all replies
    • Why don't you e-mail the ND Pipeline Commission and ask about the discrepancy? I did, and got an answer.

      And I didn't change anything about my response. That's why I keep saying you can't comprehend, and either simply can't due to lack of education, or refuse to.

      • 2 Replies to rlp2451
      • Sure ....just more stupid RLP-routine games....

        If you had a response about something relevant....then you would have already posted their response to your question.

        And, while you now try to distinguish between NEW ones and expanded ones.....you got that idea from the word expanded that is NOT the ND state's wording....that is how I compiled the list from their list.

        I like the way you changed the tune from they are not economical to build.....because you incorrectly see them as short lived....to not too many will be built....to oh, lots of them will be built all over.

        And, on this:
        "That's why I keep saying you can't comprehend, and either simply can't due to lack of education, or refuse to."

        Typical & funny.
        That is what you do when you see the ND data, know that you are incorrect, know that everyone clearly sees it, and just hope that by being vague and insulting that maybe some might believe you instead of the ND state data that shows otherwise.....well...maybe?

      • So, now you invented some fictious discrepency in something....just more games?

        "Why don't you e-mail the ND Pipeline Commission and ask about the discrepancy? I did, and got an answer."

        Like I said before...if you asked something relevany....and had some response....you would have posted whatever it is....but based on your posting history and the concoctions you dream up....I do not only have no idea what you are talking about because you were intentionally vague ....whatever it is probably does not even exist.

        If otherwise...go ahead and post it....

        you like to cut and paste...so lets see this fiction...or, it seems that you rather change the topic to which schools I did or did not graduate?

        I thought we did all that when we discussed Jack's PhD& JD sometime last year.

 
LINE
11.84-0.22(-1.82%)Mar 26 4:00 PMEDT