Thu, Sep 18, 2014, 2:45 AM EDT - U.S. Markets open in 6 hrs 45 mins

Recent

% | $
Quotes you view appear here for quick access.

Linn Energy, LLC (LINE) Message Board

  • hole_in_five hole_in_five Feb 18, 2013 10:34 AM Flag

    Put "anonymous" short-sellers in jail?

    It should be illegale to gain by putting out false stories on a stock or raising ridiculous claims and selling short at the same time. These guys, whoever they are, should be put in jail.

    SortNewest  |  Oldest  |  Most Replied Expand all replies
    • Yes, but I'd be willing to bet you that Howard Weill, which is a boutique, is not short or long Linn or Linnco.

      Howard Weill is not a hatchet shop. They are a niche investment boutique that deals heavily in the energy sector.

      If the response was pointed at Weill, it makes a mockery of Linn management, for both calling the shop anonymous and "short". On the other hand, there may be others that are indeed short that have been dealing with management. We'll likely get answers to put questions but I doubt Linn management wants to get into a shouting contest with the investment community.

      • 1 Reply to rrb1981
      • The Linn response directed every thing the Weil analyst contended (plus a bit more) and there were no other reports of any other short seller claims. I agree that Linn may have been quick on the trigger to label it "anonymous short seller" but on the other hand they saw the price dropping, they didn't want to name names, and they felt a response was needed quickly. Perhaps if they had to do it over again they wouldn't have used the term.

        This is just my conjecture. If there indeed was another short seller, that, along with the Barron's article (which used only Weil's article) then they have a more serious problem than is evident.

    • It wasn't "anonymous." Linn chose not to call out Howard Weil, instead posting a response as a veiled filing that for all intents and purposes, to the Weil analyst.

      • 2 Replies to rlp2451
      • Norris the blind fool. He subscribes too barrons.I am sure he saw this article. Refused to post it even though it was related to LINE and too investors. Instead he chooses to ,live in his world of make believe that everything is all good and nothing should be posted that might inform others of what caused this drop recently. Here is a person that said he has a degree in finance. Blames another for posting relevant news about LINE for investors to see. Now he says he will drop barrons from his list of news because they can't be trusted. yet posts right from their news letters all of time. I would dare say then that everything he has posted form Barrons has been wrong. If you follow his mind set and obsurdity. Another brain fart by our resident financial officer.

      • Th rumor of impropriety in the hedge book on trading desks; which were not fully staffed, and not this foolish hit piece.

        Like all propaganda it has some facts; which are not relevant or material, which causes uncertainty. Get enough of a run gong an the computers will mindlessly come in.

        This is not Enron will all sorts of off balance sheet items and exotic contingent deriveatives. These are puts.

        You as a sock puppet of others with a brain spread the silliness to retail investors.

        Negative behavior.

 
LINE
30.96+0.14(+0.45%)Sep 17 3:59 PMEDT

Trending Tickers

i
Trending Tickers features significant U.S. stocks showing the most dramatic increase in user interest in Yahoo Finance in the previous hour over historic norms. The list is limited to those equities which trade at least 100,000 shares on an average day and have a market cap of more than $300 million.