seems to dislike SNPS, despite praising it is more than likely to report a good earnings outcome. Whatever the reasons the FOOL decided to write not so positive about SNPS, I think at least for SNPS, unlike LAVA whose CEO just sold 30% of his holdings in May 2007, there was very little insider selling activity been going on in recent quarters.
Motley Fool compare SNPS to MENT and Cadance but not LAVA. It was unfair and unjust especially they had law suits dealings recently. Nevertheless, I still prefer SNPS to LAVA.
I am only a simple person and will continue to hold SNPS because it has all positive fundamentals. If the market should punish such a company, so be it!