All is moving along.
The Company has met with and will continue to meet with the SEC and we feel that it's possible and that CAGC should be relisted.
We remain hopeful that the 2010 Financial results will be released soon.
We remain hopeful that the 2011 Financial results will follow and that both the 2010 and 2011 results will be in line with our estimates that we gave on Bloomberg.
We stand by everything we've ever said regarding CAGC and note that Hampton nor the men and woman behind LM Research nor any short seller we've publicly challenged with specific refutation of not true statements they've made has EVER answered any of our public challenges with any credible proof what so ever. In light of that fact we still believe that the actions of LM and other short sellers were illegal manipulation of CAGC's stock for illegal economic gain we continue to bring this to the attention of Criminal authorities in China, Australia and the US.
We're pleased that another Company has filed a law suit against Hempton for similar actions
involving their stock and has brought Hempton's actions to the attention of Criminal Investigators in Canada.
Our Lawyers and investigators continue to investigate this matter and it's very likely that we will be bringing similar law suits against several short sellers in this matter.
While we can't comment on specific buying or price that we are buying CAGC nothing has changed since we last publically commented on this on Bloomberg.
As you know we continue to ignore some posters here but our lawyers of course are still monitoring them and their specific posts speak for themselves.
When the 2010 results are released and the Forensic BDO/China is released It wouldn't surprise me if CAGC trades closer to what we feel it's worth.
jg writes >>> The Company has met with and will continue to meet with the SEC and we feel that it's possible and that CAGC should be relisted.
We remain hopeful that the 2010 Financial results will be released soon.
We remain hopeful that the 2011 Financial results will follow and that both the 2010 and 2011 results will be in line with our estimates that we gave on Bloomberg. <<<<
So here is the questions:
Why on earth would you meet with the SEC requesting relisting
HOW on earth could you POSSIBLY give an opinion on relisting
BEFORE filing the SEC required financials.
BEFORE reading the SEC required financials.
Does that seem a bit silly to you ?
I can see the CAGC SEC meeting now
Hi, milk in that coffee ?
Well let us start by saying we love the USA and we love NASDQ, AMEX we love em all and we would love to be relisted
Oh, whats that you say,
if that's OK with you, we are just a bit behind
but prefer being listed now and
doing the work later.
2010 is still fresh in our mind
so don't you worry your silly heads about that.
But rest assured and we GUARANTY THIS we are hopeful it will be like we said it would in back in 2010.
Donmonfort seems the only person on this board who seems to know the problems of this company,if it is really a company.I had it before it was kicked out of the Nasdaq and I am always following it and if all the problems are gone I will be in it again.Till now the problems are always there and I would be very glad if somebody tells me why the stock went up and as you see it is goning back to peanuts.
“All is moving along” Says who, jimmy?
“The Company has met with and will continue to meet with the SEC...” How do you know that jimmy? It is unlikely the SEC told you. Are you getting inside info from your trustworthy friends at toxic CAGC.PINK, jimmy? They aren't telling the little bagholders on this board anything. I guess they would schmooze you up, since you are the only “prominent” alleged investment professional touting the stock in the media, and on a little Yahoo stock discussion board. Does Seth know what you are doing, jimmy?
“...and we feel that it's possible and that CAGC should be relisted.” Why should it be relisted, jimmy? Do you have some inside information on that? All we average saps know is some vague BS from the CAGC.PINK press release on the alleged investigation by a “Special Committee” appointed by the company brass to pretend to investigate themselves. Have you seen what has happened with Sino-Forest, after they were accused of fraud and they subsequently exonerated themselves with their own little special committee investigation? Their bank balances and everything allegedly checked out, with many hundreds of $million$ in cash accounted for, no fraud here, but they just defaulted on a $10 million bond payment, and have appointed a Special Restructuring (meaning liquidation) Committee. There's a Special Committee for everything, jimmy. A New Zealand $BILLIONAIRE$ investor who bought into the scam for a 20% stake, AFTER the fraud accusations, is highly miffed. He is more proof that money can’t buy brains, jimmy. John Paulson was also a major victim of the Seeno- Forest scam., to the tune of several hundred million dollars. You can take some comfort in being a relatively small loser on these Chinese RTOs, jimmy. Study the Seeno-Forest case. It might help you see the light, before you make an even bigger fool of yourself.
“We remain hopeful that the 2010 Financial results will be released soon.” Have they told you that, jimmy? And when you say “we”, are you talking about Seth’s firm? Or is it just jimmy/jesse personally that are hopeful?
“While we can't comment on specific buying or price that we are buying CAGC nothing has changed since we last publically commented on this on Bloomberg.” Why can’t you comment specifically, jimmy? You have stuck you neck way out already in vouching for this POS? And things have changed, since shortly after you shot your mouth off on Bloomberg. The volume and price have headed south.
“As you know we continue to ignore some posters here but our lawyers of course are still monitoring them and their specific posts speak for themselves.” You are transparent, jimmy. Your comment is a response to my post, wherein I expressed the opinion that it looked like you clowns had stopped buying. And if you are stupid enough to pay lawyers to monitor this board, I have a message for them to give to you. I told jimmy many months ago that he was making a mistake touting this POS, and that he could hire a professional investigator in China to check it out for him. NASDAQ has professionals in China to root out RTO frauds (Google it), and they wasted no time in delisting this POS, after their own investigation. And tell little jimmy he can’t intimidate me by claiming to have scheisters watching me. You don't know me jimmy.
“When the 2010 results are released and the Forensic BDO/China is released It wouldn't surprise me if CAGC trades closer to what we feel it's worth.” How much is it worth, jimmy? Are you speaking for your dad’s firm, as a SEC licensed investment adviser, jimmy?
Happy Hanukkah !
Donmonfort,wath you are telling us here I said it about 10 days ago.Immediately some people accust me to be a shorter.As a European I never shorted because my broker doesn't allow me.I got this stock 2 years ago and I am always following it and I never understood why it was going up and I don't yet understand why it is at 1,75$ because nothing changed. You seem to be the only one to understand this. Merry Christmas!!