you are viewing a single comment's thread.view the rest of the posts
It's positively ABSURD to ask a woman who has been forcibly raped to carry to term and bear the expense of bearing a child created by such a horrific act. After a forcible rape, the woman would want to do her utmost to put the past behind her; not to first have to undergo many months carrying a child conceived in hate which she absolutely does NOT want.
I didn't think that you wwere this much of an extremist but I probably shouldn't be surprised.
The Rasmussen poll is a complete GOP outlier this year and I think that it's because it isn't effectively dealing with the fact that i-Phone users (heavily for Obama on balance) just aren't being represented.
I certainly won't have to make any excuses "after Romney wins" because I have a scoop for you. HE AIN'T WINNING! PERIOD!
When a woman is raped;
A. The police are called
B. She is taken to the hospital
C. Doctors and Nurses collect evidence and take measures to sanitize her so she does not become pregnant.
D. She is also given counseling to help her.
So if a women does all of the above; your reasoning quoted below is false. If a woman fails to seek help the chances are still slim according to doctors. And then there is the morning after pill.
"It's positively ABSURD to ask a woman who has been forcibly raped to carry to term and bear the expense of bearing a child created by such a horrific act. After a forcible rape, the woman would want to do her utmost to put the past behind her; not to first have to undergo many months carrying a child conceived in hate which she absolutely does NOT want."
Now that really blows your statement out of the water and really makes you look stupid.
Explain how iPhone users are different from other cell phone users, laughable nitwit.
It's not just Rasmussen, but practically all polls that show the race a dead heat, effectively tied statistically, numbers numbskull.
In the latest Rasmussen, Obama is actually ahead by a point, which is just as insignificant as being behind by a point.
Since you're shouting with such absolute certainty, why won't you make a leave the board bet on the outcome of the election?
Ruffturd the welcher
You know very well what happens when the Guru leaves the board for only four hours ignoramus. You completely get lost and confused as there's no one to lead you by the hand. Do you want this to happen or are you just babbling to hear yourself talk?
Why do I have to tell you daily that it's in everyone's interest to have the Guru catechize the likes of you and a few others. Look at what you've learned in the past two years.
When the Guru leaves for a few hours, this board becomes non-functional. Wake up and smell the bronto beans dimwit. No wonder you can't analyze as to what is going on in politics.
Excellent point. Real Clear now has the spread down to about 1.5% Also, Romney was not on the platform committee and will not have a vote on the platform unless he happens to be a delegate. The abortion plank is exactly the same as in 2004 and 2008, another fact that excapes the moron. At this point, Romney has the momentum and it will continue at least until the Dems meet. After that, who knows? If Romney does well in the debates he wins. That is a huge "if". The debates won it for Reagan but Romney is no Reagan on television. Right now, we have a toss up and that is beyond dispute.
<<I have no problem with people being pro-choice or pro-life. I have a great problem with hypocrisy>>.
To which you responded:
<<I didn't think that you wwere this much of an extremist but I probably shouldn't be surprised>>.
I understand how one can be pro-choice and I understand how one can be pro-life and respect both sides. The latter requires a belief that life begins at conception. Such belief cannot be reconciled with an exception for rape, any more than it could be with an exception if the woman doesn't feel like raising a child, can't afford to do so or is seeing a psychiatrist for depression. The only logically possible exception is where it's a choice between the life of the child and the life of the mother. Other than that, the exceptions are simply political calculations. They are logically indefensible.
It is absolutely maniacal to look at months of daily tracking polls by both Gallup and Rasmussen which have both been consistently very close to dead even, together with all the unknowns concerning how the conventions, debates, economic data to come and potential geopolitical events before the election, especially Israel/Iran, and conclude that either side is a lock to win. It is simply your desperate need for attention that causes you to make outlandish, unsupportable claims knowing that people with logical minds and some knowledge about polls and politics will respond, if only to, with good reason, dump on your ignorance.