Name calling? I didn't call you a name. I described your actions (correctly) as ignorant. You were ignorant of the fact that IGT had already introduced their new games when you stated that all IGT had to do was come up with JUST ONE GAME and MGAM would go to 10.00. Doesn't matter who said it, that was an ignorant statement. You're the one who went off on the sputtering name-calling jag yesterday.
I calculated the impact of IGT and other competition into my take on this stock once the NIGC letter came out - you're way behind the curve.
MGAM is a one trick pony if you are ignorant of NY, San Pablo, lottery potential, charitable potential, and illegal OK machine replacement potential.
Say, will you be throwing any punches today? Or are you just going to continue with your empty jabs?
You are counting charitable gaming which has been discussed by MGAM for years and is still years away. You are counting REPLACING existing games as a revenue enhancement, existing games????? why not just count their revenue twice?
I said one IGT game meaning one game that achieves market share...they can throw game after game at the tribes until one sticks and when that one sticks MGAM is cooked.
I may be ignorant my friend but when I pay my taxes, which I gladly do, I pay more than you make in 10 years.
And with that I must move on to make my closing decisions as that is where the real money is, in case you are 'ignorant' of that little fact.