I will say this: You add a certain amount of fun hutzpuh!
But I will hasten to add that you haven't contributed anything other than speculative rants which border on misogynism. Essentially your claim is that reporterette #1 got duped because she is a dumb female. Reporterette #2 is also female, and is therefore empty headed. It probably follows that the editors of Bloomberg and Reuters must also be female. That's how they got duped when they fact-checked.
Really? Is that the best you could learn from the book?