Zydus has asserted to the trial court in Santars v Zydus that the Par decision does not preclude it from congesting the validity of the Zegerid patent. Seems like a silly argument. They are saying that not all of the prior art was considered and if it were the patent would be invalid.
The prior art should have been thoroughly reviewed in PAR vs. SNTS. Do they (Zydus) have additional prior art that would disclose/teach what the court just ruled was valid and remanded for damages? Is Zydus case on hold and for how long? If until 2016 no concern, I guess.
My knowledge Isuzu limited as to what prior art they would present. I don't know what the calendar is but I will see if I can find out. Yes! The case is on hold per the agreement of the parties pending the appeal.