Longs, put a new gmail account name on the board here and we will add you on. We are already taking and planning some form of action, and there is strength in numbers, so we need EVERYONE. Please sign on, if your not happy you could always drop off. We are planning to make better contact and have better sharing of info for LONGS only.
I have been reading this board since the halt began. can someone give me a good reason why signatures in 2008 have something to do with this halt. seems awfully shady to me like someone has an agenda or got paid. granted I own 5000 shares and would survive the loss but the principle now begins to #$%$ me off. I think some seriouse questions need to be answered by nasdaq and sec for this. there must be some way to hold them responsible or some way accountable for a witch hunt. if they don't own something or cooked the books so be it I will take my loss but this is #$%$ now. anyone who wishes to give blow back to either entity has my full support. I have patiently waited for this to resolve but really all they got was signatures in 2008........complete #$%$ someone has an agenda......and is paid. hope I have been reading your posts for months and most sensible person here. give them holly hell send me note if I can help
" can someone give me a good reason why signatures in 2008 have something to do with this halt."
Simple answer to that....
It does not have anything at all to do with the halt, but might have something to do with reinstatement plans, assuming that there was any plan to do so.
No, these recent accusations have more to do with the Glaucus report in August of 2011, if you need a valid timeline. They are the researchers who brought up the potential CFO issues, among other things.
I think you can be confident that these issues arose long before the NASDAQ halt was initiated.
Hope, earlier I gave my handle, joemama18 at gmail, only to come back as new registration from COO! I only created a new handle because my original has my full name! I asked to confirm with Mcmiller who I've had previous discussions with, in Stockhouse, under same handle! Thank You for all your input! GL Longs
I am confused by "born today". I have had this yahoo handle for 6-7years. I created a gmail account today because I normally use hotmail and wanted to continue to follow posters whose insight I appreciated. Is there any way better way of vetting longs. Needless to say this is exactly why I don't post- first post and I am told to "get lost".
says member since March 31, 2014......do you have any other proof of being a long? I-hub name with Long posts? And one that you are willing to answer immediately, like waiting there now to answer me if you have one. NAZ sight handle will do, with history of LONG posts, that I can check?
I agree with you red, some of the insight from longs on here has been invaluable, but i'm just not the type who posts on any boards. The arguing back and forth gets old, but i'm amazed at and will miss some of the impressive insight. If there is any other way of vetting longs like ourselves, i'd love to hear it as well.