ALKEF__SeekingAlpha online lightweight, I'll go with
I agree but I like look at bothe sides of ones who makes the most commpelling arguments
I cant just simply ignore the points that Seeking Alpha made. That does not mean that it isn't a great potential but I am not going into this REE buble blind..
"We eliminated Alkane Resources because based on its corporate presentation the project is minimal in rare earths with expected production of less than 5,000 tons per annum with other mineral products the primary focus of the project. We also noted that while the deposit is not classified as radioactive there is enough uranium in the deposit that Alkane put a note in its presentation that the New South Wales province in Australia bans uranium mining."
Interestingly, I view that ancillary mineral production as a BIG PLUS! LOL I have never been impressed with SeekingAlpha writers--they seem to have gotten their credentials writing for Women's Wear Daily! In the case of this article in question, far to broad and too shallow to be given my credence, IMO. Actually, I hope we all get rich with our investments irrespective of which ree stocks you own. Except, of course, that juvenile "Fester" "Pustual"> LOL