It's my opinion that they would not have announced Dr. Lakey appointment if....
It's seems unlikely to me that the company would have announced the appointment of Dr. Lakey without a high level of confidence in the license process. From Dr. Lakey's perspective as well, he would not want to participate or associate himself with a company that won't be getting a license because that would render his research and talent useless for real market applications through this company.
Yes, this is my first post and I've been sifting through these posts for a while. Some posters have been very helpful and insightful. I just thought I may be able to contribute a small bit.
Good luck to all!
Chubbs yoh know what I agree with you your not a basher. Your a nocturnal basher because you've been bashing for 22 hours no lie you have like 200 + posts all negative to add so just go to bed today because it will be less painful we go up 15% today watch. #$%$ chubbs
you could take that same flawed logic and say that about the other doctors hired many months ago, duh
furthermore, i take it as a FLUFF PR that didn't work this time because people have been burned buying into prior PUMP PRs and becoming much wiser. i also think INSIDERS have unlocked restricted shares they can dump in AUG and are upset they couldn't jack the PPS up with a PUMP yesterday at 7am
don't you just love opinions?