The far right is correct in noteing that there are alot of librals around. At least half of the american population is liberal and more than 90% of the planet is liberal. I define liberal as to the left of Bush.
"At least half of the american population is liberal and more than 90% of the planet is liberal."
interesting, so you're supporting a view that is more popular in the rest of the world than it is in the united states? if you like the rest of the world's ideology so much, why not move? i would think it speaks volumes that the most advanced nation looks down on liberalism, as a percentage of supporters when compared with other, mostly "lesser" nations.
**interesting, so you're supporting a view that is more popular in the rest of the world than it is in the united states? if you like the rest of the world's ideology so much, why not move? i would think it speaks volumes that the most advanced nation looks down on liberalism, as a percentage of supporters when compared with other, mostly "lesser" nations. **
I did not say I was supportive of liberalism. I was simply noteing that most of the people on the planet are to the left of Bush. Soon Bush will be out of office and you may have to leave this wonderful country because it will be too liberal for you.
Really? I think back in 1939 Germany had this very same outlook as a nation.
> ? i would think it speaks volumes that the
> most advanced nation looks down on
> liberalism, as a percentage of supporters
> when compared with other, mostly "lesser"
> nations.
If Liberal is "to the left of Bush" I'd wager that would include about 99.8% of the population.
Actually I think President Bush is too liberal. Hoe
cool. In time all this will be settled and we will be just fine as a country. We have a great system and as loud and opstreperous debates get, America always wins. Our enemies have trouble understand how a country that debates so much can be so strong.
God Bless Ameraca.
You may want to take some time out and read
"House of Bush, House of Saud : The Secret Relationship Between the World's Two Most Powerful Dynasties" by Craig Unger
Facinating. Keep in mind none of the terrorists were Iraqi's, but many were Saudi's. Yet, we attacked Iraq.
"Facinating. Keep in mind none of the terrorists were Iraqi's, but many were Saudi's. Yet, we attacked Iraq."
well like i said, attacking iraq isn't the issue with me...keeping this country safe is. 9/11 was going to happen regardless of who was in office. bush has done a great job protecting us since then...i have NO confidence in kerry's ability to do so.
by the way, attacking iraq has led to libya disarming and also led to talks with north korea...i agree it's awful that innocent lives were lost in iraq, but the consequences are not *all* bad.
The only person not to the left of Bush is .......... I can't think of anyone.
His mind is so made up that nothing, not even logic nor reason can shift him from his course. Even the Queen Mary could ultimately be turned or stopped.
Pete LINY
How did we end up with all the Neanderthals? (Those to the right of Bush?)
All the cro-magnons were over at Bill Clinton's house watching him consort and cavort with Monica. (kidding)
"How did we end up with all the Neanderthals? (Those to the right of Bush?)"
nice liberal, narrow-minded viewpoint...what are you, 12? everyone who doesn't agree with you is wrong. by the way, regarding your absurd comment that bush has guaranteed that we'll be terrorist targets for many years, where were you when the WTC got bombed 10 years ago? what did bush do to provoke 9/11? we have and will be targets regardless of who our president is. at least bush does something about it and protects the american people.
Interesting how all the Saudis were allowed to leave the US, by air, despite the grounding of all civilian aircraft, immediately after 9/11.
What, pray tell, did he do?
debb, we are in a war with terrorists. democrats routinely cut military/intelligence spending. is that really a good idea right now? i think before the bombing in spain, people in this country were taking bush's efforts for granted. again, everyone has their own priorities when they vote...for me this time, it's terrorism and homeland security. bush can cut taxes or raise taxes...i don't care...but i do care that he's rounded up a lot of terrorists and at the very least, disrupted their operation.