Berkshire Hathaway Inc. Message Board

  • bobo21029 bobo21029 Jul 28, 1998 6:06 PM Flag

    AXP reversal !

    .........Noticed a nice move by AXP yesterday
    reversed by todays market. Both CNN and AP blame today's
    down Dow on Asian jitters and Lewinsky's immunity deal
    !! AP says the market has fears over the "threat of
    instability in Washington" What instability are they talking
    about ?? I would guess that half those AP stringers
    were in diapers the last time the I-word [impeach] was
    thrown around with Nixon.....and he had the stones to
    really make a Constitutional crisis. Clinton's a
    marshmallow compared to him. Does Asia + Lewinsky = the
    beginning of the long expected DJIA correction...and buying
    opportunities for WEB. Comments??

    SortNewest  |  Oldest  |  Most Replied Expand all replies
    • Mr. Bobo:

      > Clinton's a marshmallow
      compared to him.

      I disagree.

      Nixon was a
      petty thief compared to a high traitor. Nixon, so far
      as I knew, did not offer government jobs to those
      who slept with him, have people killed, or take
      bribes from our country's worst enemies in order to make
      disasterous US policy. He didn't lie daily to the US people,
      he didn't keep secret FBI records in his personal
      quarters, he didn't sabotage the Secret Service's job of
      keeping the White House secure from criminals. His
      brother wasn't a petty drug criminal. Nixon's wife didn't
      commit securities fraud in order to take home bribes
      while he was in a lower office such as governor. Nixon
      didn't exploit the federal government's obscene banking
      subsidies to fraudulently sell and buy the same riverfront
      property.


      P.S. Clinton is the first president who would not have
      been eligible for a US security clearence, except for
      the fact that he was the president.

      • 3 Replies to Keith_Weiner
      • You are right about our boy president. I'd rather have a snapshot of Nixon in the Oval Office than to have "Slick Willie" in the flesh. Kudos! ljh

      • .....for refreshing my memory of Clinton's long
        history of dishonesty. I think that you and I could sit
        down over dinner and talk long into the night over
        which president did the most damage. Here's what I
        don't understand about today's AP and CNN
        report.........Why does the Dow react today to Clinton's Lewinsky
        scandal? The Dow had no trouble with the selling of the
        Lincoln bedroom or the selling of rocket technology to
        the Chinese. The Dow didn't mind Vince Foster or
        Paula Jones; totally shrugged off the various Cabinet
        officer's indictments: could care less about Webster Hubble
        and the Rose Law Firm. But now, all of a sudden
        today, the market reacts to the upcoming testimony of a
        23 year old woman ! The only conclusion that I can
        draw is that the Market feels that the Monica thing
        has the most potential for harm to the economy.
        Ironic......isn't it?

      • "Dittos" regarding Clinton.

        Greg

        PS: I still think you are a Libertarian.

    • Since 6/30/98 brokerage statements I'm ($100,000)
      on my "A" share were I to sell at yesterdays
      close.

      At $84,000/A I put a stop limit loss on at 66,000 or
      worse.

      regardless of peoples "JERRY SPRINGER"
      approach to investing i.e commentsof
      vaseline and IV(
      no I know not medical) can someone provide rational
      dialogue for both volume and price actions?

      Who is
      selling? Instittutuionals $, Sequoia, Oakmark, ....surely
      not widows and orphans?

      If stock overvalued at
      80+ then GRN for stock was a discount to future
      value, but @ 66-69,000 why shouldn't one think it's
      fairly priced?

      Yes pass through co.'s have been
      hit, but what about impct of whollyoned operating
      units so proudly lauded in the
      "OwnersManual"

      Please....some quantifiable information and not the fact that "
      a young woman with an overbite and her mother" get
      immunity.

      Gawd forbid if that's behind BRKA/B then
      WB should sell Catastrophe insurance to all
      political parties.
      Sen. Orin Hatch and Janet Reno are
      exempt as having "pre-existing conditions" caused by
      their chronic attack on MSFT

 
BRK-A
169,400.002,097.00(+1.25%)May 17 4:00 PMEDT