Sat, Jan 31, 2015, 2:39 PM EST - U.S. Markets closed


% | $
Quotes you view appear here for quick access.

Berkshire Hathaway Inc. Message Board

you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the posts
  • Novalis_97 Novalis_97 Aug 8, 1998 12:23 AM Flag

    GEICO refuses to give BRK discounts

    Before or after taxes is not relevant. If, for
    that newspaper example, the newspaper's actual P/E
    (after-taxes) was 30 but Buffett's calculated "intrinsic" P/E
    was 25, then Buffett would determine that the
    newspaper was overvalued. If the actual P/E (after taxes)
    was 20, then he'd determine the paper was
    undervalued. Or you could use the pre-tax P/E values instead
    to determine whether the paper was over or
    under-valued. If the paper's actual pre-tax P/E was above 16,
    then Buffett would determine the paper was overvalued;
    if the paper's actual pre-tax P/E was below 16, then
    Buffett would say undervalued. Whether you use the
    after-tax or the pre-tax P/E is not relevant. Whichever you
    use, you want to compare that to a company's actual
    after-tax or before-tax P/E to determine whether the
    company is over- or under-valued. That was the point of
    that example.

    Look at Coke. It's P/E is around
    50. Its pre-tax P/E will, of course, be lower because
    EPS will be higher. But whether you use the after-tax
    P/E or the pre-tax P/E, you want to compare that to
    Coke's "intrinsic" P/E (what the P/E SHOULD be), as
    determined by discounting Coke's cash flow.

    point of the newspaper example was not so much to say
    anything about using after-tax vs. before-tax figures but
    to show what the change in intrinsic value would be
    if you change the assumptions used in the perpetual
    annuity formula. If you say growth is 6% forever, then
    intrinsic value = $1 mil. / (0.10 - 0.06) = $25 million.
    $25 mil. would be the appropriate amount to pay if g
    = 6%. If the company's market capitalization is
    higher than $25 mil., then it's overvalued. On the other
    hand, if there is no growth over time but earnings "bob
    around" around an unchanging value, g = 0% and intrinsic
    value = $1 mil. / (0.10 - 0.00) = $10 mil. In this
    case, if the company's market cap. is $15 mil., the
    company is overvalued.

215,865.00-4,133.00(-1.88%)Jan 30 4:00 PMEST

Trending Tickers

Trending Tickers features significant U.S. stocks showing the most dramatic increase in user interest in Yahoo Finance in the previous hour over historic norms. The list is limited to those equities which trade at least 100,000 shares on an average day and have a market cap of more than $300 million.