Wall Street Journal: 13.9M DNDN short,
which was published in yesterday's Wall Street Journal, as of May 8th, up from 13.7M on April 8th. I know a few posts have discussed it, but this is further evidence of artificial depression of the share price.
In and of itself, i don't think one can argue that short interest is a good prognosticator: many companies deserve to be shorted, examples include ZIXI last year in the teens; TZOO last year; TASR last year, etc. But in the case of DNDN, it's clearly obvious you have a different animal. THis is a case of a bear raid going AGAINST THE DOCTOR'S ADVICE! It's as though these Wall Street guys know better than the doctor, that's the analogy.