I'm stunned by that poorly written article. You can actually get paid writing drivel like that? Someone would sell a stock because of that? Well, if it gets rid of the weak hands, it's fine by me.
What is so poor about the article? Pretty detailed IMO. You know more about GW then the article outlays? What do you disagree with what it says?
By "pretty detailed" I assume you mean "lots of words and stuff".
They just want to drive traffic to their site. Doesn't matter if there is any truth to it, just get people to click on the article. It isn't "real" analysis.