Your credibility shall suffer with me and
possibly others on this board if in the event you choose
not to answer these questions.
understand why you continue to attack Onvia or whether you
even hold shares currently. your answers to the
questions will help define your position and give me a
better understanding of your circumstance, and thus a
so if you would, please answer the
If you hold shares but believe price going down and
will never recover, then sell it and move on instead
of incurring further loss.
If you believe
stock price will continue to drop short term but rise
at a future date, then sell short and buy back at a
later "reduced" price thereby getting more shares for
the same $investment.
If you feel that this
stock will be a long term winner like i do, then why
What is your angle/strategy,
are you a day trader that has lost money on this and
are bitter? what are your current holdings, and what
was your entry price on ONVIA?
I will reply
to your questions. will you reply to mine. im sure
that the board would be interested to
p.s. My beliefs are separate from my stock holdings of
companies i choose and are more relevant to my life
decisions than any stock could ever become.
messeges. Your wrong assumptions about who posts
what is meaningless. Back to reality, What do you
think about Onvia offering goods through Mercata? More
volume, more exposure, but will it lead to a better
bottom line? If Onvia is a middleman or intermediary in
its regular business what does selling through
Mercata make ONVI?
I don't concern myself with
spelling and typos in email. Neither does anyone else who
spends much time on-line. Content rather than
As for saying I've posted "inaccurate statements
about post of others", I don't know what you're talking
about. Perhaps you're jumpy cause I may have pegged you,
like others on some of these boards, as someone who
uses more than one screen name.
As far as
sticking to "facts", I don't see any facts in any of your
1. I am not bobo
2. I never said ONVI had
"nowhere (yes, that's one word) to go but in the toilet".
I actually have said that, despite the negatives,
it was probably not a bad bet at $5. I also have
specifically said that some dotcoms were going to make a ton
of money BUT some are not (please let me know if
that seems to be an unreasonable statement).
the impulse to act, and post (and structure your
sentences) like a seven year old gets a bit overwhelming at
times, but please try to restrain yourself. If you do
have to post, try sticking to the facts instead of
rants filled with inaccurate statements about the posts
Bobo & GoodExcuse (one & the same),
folks, ONVI's just got such terrible fundamentals, burn
rates, margins, and oh those terrible interest rates. I
think you're right - Onvi's just got no where to go
along with all these other internet startups but in the
Now, are you happy?
what bobo's motivations are, I think dismissing
his posts as unsubstantiated bashing is way off the
mark. You may not appreciate the tone of his posts, but
burn rates, margins, interest rates, etc. are plain
cold facts with direct bearing on the future of this
company. It's a lot more "factual" stuff than the "good
idea" "smart people" lines which seem to be the only
support that the Pollyannas on this board cite.
As investors and contributors of usefull info re
ONVI we care a great deal if we're having to have to
sift through pages of useless negativity with no
substantiation. Previously I backed up Amazing's request for an
answer to her questions. Bobo called us a 'Duo'. Perhaps
so to the extent that I found Amazing's posts
constructive whereas Bobo's the opposite. I'm the 'long' one
that can "afford to be". Didn't say anything about
afford to 'lose' as Bobo elludes to.
soap opera. I don't have any factual or helpfull ONVI
news to share at this point but will when I do. Until
then - happy trails to $18 and please, Bobo will you
tell us what's your interest in ONVI!
I don't care what boboli's 'motivations' are for
posting, and I wish he would tone down the bile
content...BUT...he does make a point about negative margins and the
internet economy and ONVI. Focusing on WHY he posts here
isn't going to make his points more or less accurate.