I have a very bad feeling here...when you let a CEO go for cause and don't say what the cause was, that makes me a very, very worried long.
He could have really screwed us in some way that we are about to find out. I hope he just stole a few million dollars or something!
I don't know -- but I'm staying in.
Had to decide, one way or the other. I may regret this, but I'm hoping/betting/guessing that any potential damage won't lower EXM's actual value to anywhere near to its current price. So maybe there's an equal chance sellers will be kicking themselves. Who knows?
If I'm wrong, this won't be the first time the @#$%&!! stock market got me.
They ain't gettin' a virgin, that's for sure!
PS Still won't ever come out behind on EXM after making so much money last year. My position now is a fraction of that one.
...."You've settled into a very strange pattern of tirades and fits with no merit whatsoever. Is this likely to be your MO going forward? I always held out hope you would settle down a bit and debate in reasonable manner, but it's looking unlikely.".............
IT MIGHT SEEM A STRANGE PATTERN TO YOU, audioFOOL, BUT THAT'S THE WAY I TREAT CHARLATANS AND PENNY STOCK GAMBLERS INTENT ON LYING AND CONFUSING THE BOARD ON YOUR STUPID REMARKS ON HOW (THRU YOUR ALIASES, ESPECIALLY semper idiot, smartone the stupid banker, EVIDENTLY PUT TO PASTURE), BAD THE 3RD QTR QMAR EARNINGS WERE AND THE INEFFCIENT WAY THAT MOLARIS WAS RUNNING QMAR OR YOUR STUPID COMMENT ABOUT NEW SHIPPING TECHNOLOGY SPEEDING UP DELIVERIES WHICH WAS TOTALLY FACTLESS.
JUST DOING MY BEST, audioFOOL, TO KEEP THE BOARD WELL AWARE OF THE TRUE FACTS AND NOT TO BE SWAYED BY SOME EGOTISTICAL NUT WHO FANCIES HIMSELF MORE KNOWLEDGEABLE ON DRYBULK SHIPPERS THAN THE PROFESSIONAL ANALYSTS WHO COVER THEM.
TO CORROBORATE LINK......
....."The link was provided on the QMAR board by foostar I believe. I could dig it up if you like."......
I BET YOU COULD, audioFOOL, ESPECIALLY WHEN YOUR CONSIDER HE'S ONE OF YOUR MANY ALIASES. BUT YOU MAY IF YOU WISH, BUT THE FACTS WILL SHOW THAT ECONOMOU PAID MORE THAN TWICE THE PRICE THAT MOLARIS PAID FOR HIS CAPES ($76MIL), ILLUSTRATING WHY HE WILL SHORTLY BE THE CEO OF EXM.
P.S. LET THE RECORD ALSO SHOW THAT QMARS CAPES WILL BE BRAND NEW WHILE ECONOMOU PAID MORE THEN TWICE THE PRICE FOR AN OLDER CAPE. YUK, YUK, YUK
......."The date, man, the date. 187 million for a Cape on what date?".....
WHAT DIFFERENCE DOES THE DATE MAKE, audioFOOL, I DON'T KEEP A ROLLADEX ON EVERY TRANSACTION. I EMPHATICALLY STATED THAT ECONOMOU WAS OUTSMARTED BY MOLARIS WHEN THE GREEK GAMBLER SHELLED OUT SUBSTANTIALLY MORE AROUND $187MIL LAST AUGUST OR SEPTEMBER THAN QMAR PAID FOR THEIR CAPES WHICH WAS $76MIL/EA. AND YOU CAME BACK WITH THE REMARK THAT ECONOMOU WOULD GET THE COST BACK PUTTING IT ON SPOT.
You've settled into a very strange pattern of tirades and fits with no merit whatsoever. Is this likely to be your MO going forward? I always held out hope you would settle down a bit and debate in reasonable manner, but it's looking unlikely.