GERS Motion for Summary Judgment Should be Granted, Defendants Failed to Raise any Genuine Issues
"In support of their invalidity challenges under 112, Defendants rely mostly on attorney argument and ignore the undisputed facts. Defendants allege that the Patents-in-Suit are invalid because (1) the term “substantially” is indefinite; (2) the heating step is not supported by the written description; and (3) mechanically processing a stream containing at least 15% or 30% moisture is not enabled. However, the undisputed facts clearly demonstrate that the Patents-in-Suit comply with each and every requirement of 35 U.S.C. 112. Defendants have not raised any genuine issues of material fact and CleanTech’s motion for summary judgment under 112 should be granted."
All the bashing and patent infringing PEIX is the one that's down today...lol...
The difference between what I post and what the bashers post is clear.
I post factual information from the courts and the USPTO, they post scam run run scam run.
There is no doubt GERS is winning, and the defendants are losing. If the judge was ruling in the defendants favor, the bashers would be pointing it out. Since they're not able to do that, they're left with empty, meaningless posts that do nothing but eat up bandwidth.
PEIX is being sued by GERS for patent infringement. PEIX is losing BTW, now facing Summary Judgment meaning GERS asked the judge to decide since there is overwhelming evidence PEIX has committed a crime. If the judge grants GERS' motion, the lawsuit will be over, PEIX will be forced to pay millions in damages including back royalties and court costs. PEIX will then have no choice but to either license GERS' patents or halt their illegal use of GreenShift's technology. If the judge rules, GERS will be instantly profitable, debt free, and the lawsuit will be over.
From the evidence that's there, PEIX has already lost.
Many if not all of the bashers on this board are directly tied to infringing companies being sued. They know their time is up.