To: Josh and other bashers here is the question again
How is that an answer to the question I posed?
"WHAT WOULD YOU HAVE DONE DIFFERENT TO TAKE THIS COMPANY OVER?"
What you proposed would happen after the company was under your control. My question is what would you do different to take Pure over?
I can see you are trying to sound intelligent, please stop you are making the posters sick. You do not have the ability, nor the intelligence to take a company from the founding principle. Neither does Seattle49 or anyone else on this stupid message board, including myself.
So stop trying to criticize and maybe learn something from the experience of the new management team. There is a reason Mr. Pfanzelter (spelling may be wrong) is the COB and not you or anyone else here.
And Rocketman you are wrong, the new management team said they are dedicated to finding out who is on this board. Yes they have more than enough money for slanderous posters like yourself.
I answered it. I would think long and hard about getting involved with people whose publicly available history does show success at turnarounds. Period. That's how for a start. IF I found the right people, I would seriously consider what the potential upside is viz.
So do you not like Davod Pfanzelter or Peter Wulff? Interesting I thought they had a stellar background?
Your answer never claimed how to get a hold of the company legally. Basically proving you do not have a clue how to do a take over!
Taken her in bankruptcy was the best option. Now all you have is debt
payments and Krall parachute which cannot be paid other than by
issuing more stock to lemmings. Its going there anyway with no sales
at some point and this is just more shenanigans designed to get more
lemmings money so they can keep getting paid for accomplishing
squat. Now that Krall and Singer are just consultants(LOL) they will
go hard at the SEC for effectiveness statement, issue bogus press
releases to pump stock and dump new shares on the most obtuse
people on earth.