"My conclusion is, that I don't think a final bottom has been seen, but it does appear to be a good candidate for a bounce or rally attempt". This is an example of all three example links you gave. You never came out with a set direction. It was like listening to a politician that doesn't want to be held accountable for a position. Hell, anyone can do your analysis, how's this? "VRTX has a great HEPC potential which could cause the stock to rise, but the lackluster 702 PR could make the stock drop". ALSO, VRTX might go up after the CITIgroup conference, and it might not"...who wants to subscribe to my newsletter?...
Something I have noticed in these message board groups is that if someone doesn't agree with a point of view, they are raked over the coals by one of their pals, then put on ignore. So basically you end up with two separate boards. This would make for a good Sociology experiment.
whether or not a "final" low has been seen is still open, and not even the point. Most people who practice TA don't get in the business of picking price levels for tops or bottoms. That is ridiculous. But thank you for pointing out that I was calling for a bounce or rally attempt, as so far, it has done that.
If you read those 3 posts, I laid out a position against the short bashers as to why it had a better chance of bouncing from there than falling. So far, so good.
And, if you think anyone can do it, it takes years of study and you are always learning. It is like me saying that anyone can do what you do. The reason why people like you are put on ignore is because you attack people even when they are right, like here, and never back anything up with substance.