Sun, Aug 31, 2014, 12:26 AM EDT - U.S. Markets closed


% | $
Quotes you view appear here for quick access.

Vertex Pharmaceuticals Incorporated Message Board

you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the posts
  • thirdmeinvestor thirdmeinvestor Oct 10, 2012 10:00 AM Flag

    Questions relayed by Feuerstein

    The text was cut off again. So, I am reposting.

    2. Did huge outliers drive the FEV1 benefit in the 600 mg dose arm that will be studied in phase III?

    A. At a Morgan Stanley Conf. webcast, CFO stated [NO] to a similar question by Friedman. It is unlikely to have few wild data points to drive the average to the high value because if this scenario were true, the p-value would not be so low,

    SortNewest  |  Oldest  |  Most Replied Expand all replies
    • 3. Was the sweat chloride change at 200 mg and 400 mg statistically significant?

      A. The late June PR states, I am quoting:
      [A statistically significant reduction in sweat chloride was observed from Day 0 to 28 in homozygous patients treated with VX-809 (200mg, 400mg) alone compared to placebo. Additional reductions in sweat chloride were observed between Day 28 and 56, but were not statistically significant.].
      This result is qualitatively similar to the change in the 600 mg arm.

      4. Why did VX-809 as a monotherapy do worse than placebo? What activity does VX-809 have in the first place?

      A. Feuerstein thought that this highlights one of [weirder] data points of the study. This question is rather meaningless and I disagree with Adam's response. The Placebo arm scored -0.9 (p=0.54), the 600 mg arm scored -2.9 (p=0.07) after 28 days. Both numbers have high p-values. This means that the difference between their decreases is also NOT statistically significant.
      But it is significant that both decreased. I have been saying that it is important to know the first 28 day course of 200 mg and 400 mg arms. The reason is that if FEV1 for both arms decreased like the placebo and 600 mg arms, we know why all of them decreased. I predict that all arms show a decreasing lung function in the first half (28 days) of the trial.

      5. What were the baseline values for the patients in the study?

      A. This is an excellent question. The lung function had to be determined before the dosing in order to measure the effect of the drugs. Since antibiotics dosing was withdrawn for all participants at the beginning of 809 dosing, its effect on the lung function has to be estimated with a good data collected from the placebo arm before and after the withdrawal. In Ph. III, 50% of the placebo arm should receive antibiotics to isolate its effect.

    • What are your impressions of Dr Boyle's presentation and the investor conference? The questions relayed by Feuerstein were answered--right?

      Sentiment: Strong Buy

93.57+0.77(+0.83%)Aug 29 4:00 PMEDT

Trending Tickers

Trending Tickers features significant U.S. stocks showing the most dramatic increase in user interest in Yahoo Finance in the previous hour over historic norms. The list is limited to those equities which trade at least 100,000 shares on an average day and have a market cap of more than $300 million.
Burger King Worldwide, Inc.
NYSEFri, Aug 29, 2014 4:02 PM EDT
Avago Technologies Limited
NasdaqGSFri, Aug 29, 2014 4:00 PM EDT