As it has been mentioned by Third and others, it is amazing that all these analysts who have commented on the cure rate of ABT vs GILD have already declared GILD as the winner and not taking into account that GILD's results are SVR4 where as ABT's is SVR12 and yet these analysts, including Adam F and the clueless motleyfools writers, get large sums of money for writting their S%&@.