i disagree with the derogatory remarks about ellen; yes, science will drive the future and she is definitely equipped for the task; have you ever noticed how tired the male ceo's look? I personally find her humane and knowledgeable, tough and nice at the same time. let's stock to the stock's increasing price and how well it seems to run with a woman's touch.
"why are trolls always negative? They feed on being responded to but tend not to take heed of what anyone else says."
That would describe Funnut to a TEE. I guess we aren't alone with having our own troll. If you have any good ideas on how to get him to move on let everyone know.
The bipolar, multiple IDs, etc. has been the case with Funnut all along. I'm surprised he lasted so long at Uncle DuPey anyway. Maybe he go so bizaar that DuPont offered him a large sum to leave.
why are trolls always negative? There is a troll on the PANL board, and there was one on the NVEC board, and they feed on being responded to but tend not to take heed of what anyone else says. The one on the NVEC board had become so bipolar and OCD ADHD (both trolls I refer to had a large number of multiple IDs and a huge chip on their shoulders which somehow drove them to be intentionally annoying) that he began threatening people, was finally arrested and institutionalizedafter sending threatening emails to a Canadian governor. The main offerings of a troll are confusion, ignorance, annoyance, distraction and clutter. Better to put them on ITU (which they realize and then change their IDs so you see their annoying posts again and which is why trolls eventually tend to wind up with the largest numbers of multiple ID handles).
Poor, poor fun fun. His passion for life is all but diminished (but he has his keyboard), his physical biology is getting kaput (but he has his words and oxford dictionary), his demeanor is sour, negative and vitriolic (but he has his clones), his commentary is skewed and obstinate (but he has himself).
Fun fun is left with himself. I think that is the saddest thing I've ever heard. Can you imagine waking up every day being him??
My friend, you have officially JUMPED THE SHARK. You offer no provocative thought only cheap headlines that any moron can gleen over the wires. That does not make you intelligent no matter what big words you use. I admit, you may beat me at completeing the New York Times cross word puzzle, but you will never hold a candle to anyone when it comes to investing and making money.
We make allowances for fun"zig". He doesn't like the idea of a woman being in charge. He doesn't seem to like authority of any kind, as he feels he is superior in every way to the rest of us. Thats why he is on the outside looking in....
It should be telling to investors far and wide that all these sleazy DuPont employees heckling and shilling for DuPont Management can do is launch vindictive personal attacks against outside commentators to suppress open debate on this Company. They never engage in civil discourse or rational discussion of critical DuPont issues.
Regardless of gender, DuPont in the opinion of the undersigned investor, has been badly managed for nearly two decades, and hence the dramatic fall in prestige and relevancy of this fading chemical conglomerate in the 21st century.
And yes, we stand by our observance that Ms. Cull-Men's "recovery" of DuPont profits to date since 2009 has been largely propelled by killing off thousands of DuPont jobs primarily in the U. S. coupled with one-time tax benefits. What's next to counterfeit "sustainable growth" in margins and total net income?