Frog and others have stated that Danny Glover is a profesor of constitutional law at A&M. In fact Glover is an actor who spoke at A&M as a guest where he stated that the second amendment was created to protect slave owners, etc. No one took him any more seriously than someone off the street.
Glover has no credentials and no students.
Frog and his crowd know this but started this lie so they could refute "Professor" Glover. In academic parlance, this is called setting up a straw dog so you can knock him down.
Is there anyone on the right who has the ability to tell the truth? What a sick, lying group this is . "Do you, at long last, have no ......?"
Frog, you are lying ignorant fool.
Are you telling me that when Mr. Glover was invited to speak at Texas A&M about the genesis of the second ammendment, that he was just some actor from hollywood.
Wow I must admit my surprise that an educational institution of the stature of this great university would not have had the forsight to have investigated whether Mr. Glover's words had any educational value or credibility.
All I can say is thanks ellerbe for pointing out my error in judgement. You have truly put me in my place, and I will try and do better next time.
"when Mr. Glover was invited to speak at Texas A&M about the genesis of the second ammendment,"
Get over yourselves, will ya. He wasn't invited to speak about the genesis of the second amendment. He was invited to speak at a small, MLK day "breakfast". The topic came up during the discussion.
For you, Froggie, to be criticizing someone for expressing an opinion without necessarily having the qualifications to back it up is just absurd. The funny thing is Mr. Glover's statement is correct. But that doesn't matter to you at all, does it?