To the GNRC Apologists (at least I hope you feel like apologizing)
I appreciate the recognition as that "poor long who bought" after the institutional handlers withdrew their secondary, before the second secondary. Name calling aside (you guys are a hoot), I'd like one of you GNRC apologists to explain to my dense brain how it is ethical and responsible to drive the price down, drive the price up, and then drive the price down again in the space of almost 24 hours - aftermarket where we are mostly trapped out - when a company's raison d'etre is to serve the shareholders (yes, even the super-minority fools like me). I mean, if it is just stupidity then please send me one of your (way cool) generators and so make it right. But otherwise, it smacks of price manipulation.
And, by the way, for those of you who enjoy TA, take a look at the how the monthly candlestick interval will end on the charts tomorrow (unless by some miracle or another sleight of hand they drive the stock up a couple points tomorrow, which I'd appreciate). While the topping reversal will require confirmation by December's action, it implies that the upside potential for this stock is trashed for a couple of months at least. Ironically, if they'd not twice manipulated the stock price this week, the month would have ended on a bullish note. Hence, DIE YOU POS!