I'm not happy about dilution but it's waaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaay more than reflected in the market cap. They're being valued like a distressed company instead of a growth company that hit a rough patch. They should be trading for 2X-3X revenues not 0.6X revenues.
If you have a link to where you post analysis (I know a few) under any name, could you shoot me a link that I will keep to myself at cswolfe at yahoo dot com? I'd greatly appreciate it. I stopped being a buy and holder in 2008. However, I always appreciate learning. As for your MF portfolio, no need. I think I already have that bookmarked. Thank you very much for dropping buy. I know you don't like that whole praise thing (and neither do I), so my apologies for being so offputting. However, facts are facts, and performance is performance, evaluated over the only true eval that matters: Consistency over time.
Anybody who doesn't take mylkvveed's analysis more seriously than some far better known analysts, um, you should. But I realize people believe what they want to believe no matter how lacking in support their ideas are, so at the end of the day, I can only do what I do.
<<<A growth company that is losing customers. You've got a funny idea of growth.
Without Draw Something - and that's an overrated loser right now - their sequential DAU would be down. DOWN.
They are in trouble. If you don't want to see it, I can't help you.>>> ***************************
Beisdes the fact that this is one quarter and one game you are aware their revenues grew both y/y and sequentially right? I never said this was a good quarter but lets put this in the proper perspective.