I have researched the insider trading report for
Curious to know who Scott D. Putney is. He is classified
as an "Insider", but is identified as an "Affiliated
Person" on the report.
Who is he? Cnsultant? Past
Director? Financial Advisor?
He took a cool 2.25
Million in stock sales between Jan and March
I am not sure I understand your interest in the
issue. Are you a member of the plaintiff's bar? You
mention you have a "trac [sic} record of filing
investigative material...." are you a professional aggrieved
investor? Since your supposition of spinning has been
forwarded to the authorities who will choose to investigate
it or not, and if they do will have access to
nonpublic information, what is to be gained by our making
uniformed guesses that will serve, perhaps, to raise doubts
about the integrity of people who should be innocent
until proven guilty. The NASD will look at Paine Webber
(having little authority over ALKS) and the SEC can look
at what it likes. I suggest our time on this page is
better spent examining company specific and market
issues with regarding the stock while we wait to see if
the authorities see the same conspiracy you do.
I have recently forwarded
investigative information to the SEC Enforcement Division, and
the NASD Regulation Enforcement Division.
focus is "Spinning" allegations, and "irregular"
compensation practices by Venture Funding/Investment
Partnership and Stock Company Executives.
message board is an excellent forum for discussion on
this issue. Please review the posted information, and
get back with comments and questions. I ask that you
post on this message board, and not e-mail the web
site. This way we can maintain an ongoing forum for all
This analysis is made utilizing only
publically accessible information. Although I have no
guarentees the SEC and NASD will move forward on this info,
I do have a trac record of filing investigative
material which has resulted in SEC Enforcement
Thank you, and I look forward to an informative
Does anyone else see a problem with this type of
the good news about these chat boards is that
enough investors with judgment use them for good
purpose. c. emptor.....suggest you call the sec asap...and
tell us what they tell you. otherwise, please stop
this uninformed and irresponsible gossip. lb
I have conducted extensive research
into certain majority stockholders of this
In November of 1997, a shift of Venture Funding
Management accured which I believe is important all
investors to know about.
This fund/partnership controls
a SIGNIFICANTstock position, and has long term
relationships with executives of the company.
like to initiate discussion on this issue. Keep posted
to the message board. Is anyone
Congratulations, you found out that an
institutional investor took a significant position in the
stock, what is your point? Are you stating that there is
some irregularity in either the acquisition of stock
or the relationship of the fund with the managers of
ALKS. What exactly are you saying because the managers,
the investors, the SEC and the NASD will undoubtedly
be interested in your comments. How about starting
the discussion by abandoning the "C Emptor" nonsense
and using your name?