The recent article by Street.Com has certainly
damaged the credibility of SCLN and the value of our
investments. The easiest way to remedy the situation is to
hear testimony from doctors or patiants who have given
or received the products of SCLN. I need to know
first hand that the Steet.Com article is based on false
information and who can better refute their arguments than
people who have been direct participants. Doctors and
patients plaese respond or I will start to have my doubts
I don't care. I made $1500 on Friday. Not bad for
a dumbass (mo mo)investor.
Is the 'victory'
website really maintained by an individual investor, or
is this some kind of slick advertising created by
one of the institutions holding this stock? It does
resemble some type of a used car sale advertisement. I
like it though. Lots of valuable links.
I am just a Man with a diease looking for
answers. I will write you an article I have when I get the
chance just putting my feelings on this board I will
reprint some info if you wish. No reason to be a wise
a little too quickly. I shorted SCLN late Friday
morning and covered by 2:00pm (for a point and a half
gain.) I got the crap scared out of me after visiting
the SCLN Victory website. After reading up on this
company, I'm seriously considering going long. I'll
definitely wait for the MACDs to turn positive before making
any purchase though.
I'll be trying to contact
this company either today or tomorrow to find out if
there are any American doctors that I can contact which
have first hand knowledge of Zadaxin.
most shorters will cover late today or early tomorrow
morning. If SCLN opens flat or up tomorrow, expect strong
short covering. JMHO
Yes. I am long but currently only 500 shares. I
figure I will have several opportunties to get back to
where I was - so I will be adding to my position over
TSC article doesn't change my position on SCLN's
ultimate potential - it just may be harder to get there if
we have these shorts buzzing around for
I think SCLN will be a quit hitter for the shorts
that follow TSC. If I am right, we may get a snap-back
as the shorts cover their positions and move on to
more promising targets.
If you can give me a biological/chemical reason
why ZADAXIN will fail, I'm all ears. No one has been
able to do that. They have already shown it as
effective in the U.S. against Hep C in Phase II trials or
they wouldn't be planning on starting Phase III
trails. So what drug will do better? Point me at a web
page. I have an open mind.
Oh heaven forbid that someone might say something
bad about this great ZADAXIN. Then the person is a
paid basher a liar, idiot, freak, nut,and on and on.
Well I for one say ZADAXIN will be passed by on the
drug highway in the treatment of
HEP C in this
country and Time will prove me right.....
Probably because most of us are from the U.S. and
it isn't approved here yet. ZADAXIN is in trials and
it would be illegal (guessing here) for anyone from
the U.S. to comment on those. So where are you
expecting comments to come from? Do you go buy stock of
every drug company whose drugs you take? Do you give
testimony on their message boards? The way you are beating
this point to death I'm starting to believe you are