just one thing except the questions were already cleared up.
ahem it is his incompetence at not knowing how to read geological reports that made himself humiliated and thus bitter and desperate to prove himself correct otherwise it will destroy his reputation.
it was proven already.
most recent articles of his were flat out wrong, about myles gao stuttering and he thus made a misrepresentation he had to have known 2005 was added in 2007 unless he was blind and about this time as well he had to have known he left out proven+ probable.
also he didn't do any calculations as it would discredit himself Gave him the info he completely ignores because it made him out to be a fool.
he is a master pump and dumper + basher/short distort.
ALSO AL has been wrong remember eosfunds? that was his investment vehicle for his old business. when all your old investments were wrong why suddenly he has a 100% track record. lol. lord people are so gullible.
yes and Jonathan Lebed is legit right? told you guys to investigate these guys pasts
and research the so called research reports themselves have you done so or have you been looking at his headlines and thinking oh he must be right without even reading and understanding the material farther than what he wants you to.
that in itself is bad research for you guys.
have you compared it with other miners looked up the terms made sure everything was in order? probably not.
His eosfunds what was it invested in I wonder. Such bad investments shall we say that he needed to close shop eh? went behind is clients to short most likely as well goldman/subprime style.
wonder why all of a sudden he is 100% right when he was 99.999% wrong in his real business eh?
I read a Forbes article on RINO pumping it up the day before the crash. Foolish me, I trusted Forbes reporters at the time and bought. Forbes quickly deleted the story as I lost 10's of thousands. WSJ, Barrons, SA, MFool, etc. are all as believable as yahoo posters.